• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness >Patient care drives mandatory vaccination
【24h】

Patient care drives mandatory vaccination

机译：病人护理需要强制接种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Both sides debating mandatory flu vaccination for healthcare workers canvass central arguments, but key issues require further exploration. Neitherside acknowledged that health care differs fundamentally from other work. Its primary aim is not individual protection but protection of patients by reducing nosocomial flu. John Stuart Mills would support, not oppose, a mandatory programme. The autonomy argument focuses on individual rights of healthcare workers, ignoring the rights of others. Ethical assessment requires us to balance competing rights, and should include a patient's right to a safe healthcare environment. Australian States and Territories already require hepatitis B vaccination for those who are not immune and provide patient care. Individual autonomy is not catered for, with healthcare workers exercising their right to choose more fundamentally: either work in health care and minimise the risk of infecting.patients or work elsewhere.
机译：双方就医护人员强制接种流感疫苗进行辩论，讨论了主要论点，但关键问题需要进一步探讨。双方都没有承认卫生保健从根本上不同于其他工作。其主要目的不是个人保护，而是通过减少医院流感来保护患者。 John Stuart Mills将支持而不是反对强制性计划。自治论点集中在医护人员的个人权利上，而忽略了其他人的权利。道德评估要求我们在竞争权之间取得平衡，其中应包括患者享有安全医疗环境的权利。澳大利亚各州和领地已经为那些没有免疫力并提供病人护理的人要求进行乙肝疫苗接种。不能满足个人自主权，医护人员行使从根本上进行选择的权利：从事医疗保健工作并尽量减少感染病人的风险或在其他地方工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号