...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
【24h】

Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.

机译：是一种建议在未产妇中引产的较好方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Slow release prostaglandin pessary (propess) is compared with instant release prostaglandin gel (prostin) for the induction of labour in nulliparous women with a modified Bishop's score of less than 6. In this randomised study 50 women received prostin gel and 45 received propess. More than one dose of prostaglandin was required to achieve amniotomy more often in the propess group (53%) compared with the prostin group (34%) (P=0.03). Propess was unable to demonstrate any advantage over Prostin gel group. Propess was not cost-effective in this study.
机译：将经缓释的前列腺素子宫托（propess）与速释前列腺素凝胶（prostin）进行比较，以比较Bishop评分低于6的未产妇引产。在这项随机研究中，有50名妇女接受了prostin凝胶，有45名妇女接受了prostin。与前列腺素组（34％）相比，前列腺素组（53％）更需要多于一次剂量的前列腺素（53％）（P = 0.03）。 Propess无法证明比Prostin凝胶组更具优势。在这项研究中，Propess并不划算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号