首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >A short and valid measure of work-family enrichment
【24h】

A short and valid measure of work-family enrichment

机译:一种简短有效的衡量工作家庭充实的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The stream of research concerning work-family enrichment has generated a significant body of research because it plays an important role in occupational health (Masuda, McNall, Allen, & Nicklin, 2012). work-family enrichment has been defined as "the extent to which experiences in one role improve the quality of life in the other role" (Greenhaus & Powell, 2006, p. 73). Within work-family enrichment, there are two directions: work to family and family to work. Carlson, Kacmar, Wayne, and Grzywacz (2006) developed an 18-item scale to measure this construct. Although the scale has been shown to be both reliable and valid, it also requires work-family researchers to include a proportionally large number of items to capture this construct in a study. The goal of the current study was to isolate a subset of the items in this measure that produces results similar to the full version thereby providing a more streamlined scale for researchers. Using a five-sample study that follows the scale reduction procedures offered by Stanton, Sinar, Balzer, and Smith (2002), we provide evidence that scales containing only three items for each direction of enrichment produce results equivalent to the full scale with respect to reliability and discriminant, convergent, and predictive validity. Reducing the original scale by two thirds, without losing explanatory power, allows scholars to measure enrichment in the work and family domains more efficiently, which should help minimize survey time, lower refusal rates, and generate less missing data.
机译:关于工作家庭充实的研究流已经产生了重要的研究体,因为它在职业健康中起着重要的作用(Masuda,McNall,Allen和Nicklin,2012年)。工作家庭的充实被定义为“一个角色的经验在多大程度上改善了另一角色的生活质量”(Greenhaus&Powell,2006,第73页)。在工作家庭充实中,有两个方向:为家庭工作和为家庭工作。 Carlson,Kacmar,Wayne和Grzywacz(2006)开发了18个项目的量表来测量此构造。尽管已证明该量表既可靠又有效,但它还要求工作家庭研究人员包括一定比例的大量物品,以在研究中捕获这种结构。当前研究的目的是在此度量标准中分离出一部分项,以产生与完整版本类似的结果,从而为研究人员提供更简化的规模。根据斯坦顿(Stanton),锡纳尔(Sinar),巴尔泽(Balzer)和史密斯(Smith)(2002)提供的按比例缩小程序进行的五样本研究,我们提供了证据,表明每个富集方向仅包含三个项目的比例所产生的结果就等于可靠性和区别性,收敛性和预测有效性。将原始比例降低三分之二,而又不会失去解释力,这使学者们可以更有效地衡量工作和家庭领域的丰富程度,这将有助于减少调查时间,降低拒绝率并减少丢失的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号