...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy >Nasogastric and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Use in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Nasogastric and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Use in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Comparative Study

机译：鼻胃癌和经皮内窥镜胃造口术在晚期头颈癌患者中的使用：比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To compare the efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric (NGT) tube administration of enteral nutrition in head and neck cancer patients undergoing curative treatment, the authors conducted a prospective study to compare nutritional outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. PEG patients sustained significantly less reduction in nutritional parameters, measured at 6 weeks post insertion, as compared with NGT patients. There was also a statistically significant difference between the two groups in patient's quality of life scores and complications. Comparison could not be done at 6 months because all patients were converted to PEG feeding due to the earlier findings. The authors conclude that PEG is more efficacious than NGT as a channel for nutrition in advanced head and neck cancer patients over a short duration.
机译：为了比较经皮内窥镜胃造口术（PEG）和鼻胃管（NGT）管对接受治疗的头颈癌患者的肠内营养的疗效，作者进行了一项前瞻性研究，以比较营养结果，并发症和患者满意度。与NGT患者相比，插入后6周时，PEG患者的营养参数下降显着减少。两组患者的生活质量评分和并发症之间也有统计学上的显着差异。在6个月时无法进行比较，因为由于早期发现，所有患者均转为PEG喂养。作者得出的结论是，PEG在短期内可作为晚期头颈癌患者营养的有效途径，比NGT更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号