首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >A factor analytic study of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 in untreated patients with delirium.
【24h】

A factor analytic study of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 in untreated patients with delirium.

机译:未经治疗的del妄患者的the妄评定量表修订版-98的因子分析研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Existing factor analytic studies of symptoms of delirium are mostly based on small numbers of patients from specialized settings. This study thus sought to examine the factor structure of symptoms of delirium in a reasonably large sample of untreated patients referred to liaison psychiatric services of a multi-specialty hospital in north India, employing the more commonly used Delirium Rating Scale-Revised Version-1998 (DRS-R-98). METHOD: Patients (n=151) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria for delirium were assessed with the DRS-R-98 prior to starting treatment with psychotropics. A principal component analysis was carried out to determine the factor structure of the symptoms based on these ratings. RESULTS: Unlike previous efforts, patients of this study were relatively younger (mean age 47 years), with mainly hyperactive delirium, and did not have comorbid dementia. Three factors which together explained 47.32 % of variance of symptoms were identified. A "global cognitive" factor including disturbances of orientation, attention, short- and long-term memory, and visuospatial ability accounted for 18.33% of the variance. A "sleep and motor symptoms" factor consisting of sleep-wake cycle disturbances; delusions; and perceptual disturbances including hallucinations, motor-agitation, inverse of motor-retardation, and affect-lability accounted for 16% of the variance. A thought and language process, temporal onset, and fluctuation of symptoms explained 13% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the current factor analysis not only confirmed the presence of three principal symptom dimensions of delirium (found in several previous studies) but also extended these findings to a broader group of patients usually referred to liaison psychiatric services.
机译:目的:关于ir妄症状的现有因素分析研究主要是基于少数来自特殊场合的患者。因此,本研究试图采用更常用的1998年r妄者评定量表修订版,来检查印度北部一家专科医院的联络精神病学服务的相当大的未经治疗患者的symptoms妄症状的因子结构( DRS-R-98)。方法:在开始使用精神药物治疗之前,使用DRS-R-98对符合精神障碍诊断和统计手册,第四版,Edition妄文本修订标准的患者(n = 151)进行评估。进行主成分分析以基于这些等级确定症状的因子结构。结果:与以前的努力不同,本研究的患者相对年轻(平均年龄47岁),主要表现为active妄亢进,没有合并症。确定了三个因素,它们共同解释了症状差异的47.32%。包括方向,注意力,短期和长期记忆以及视觉空间能力障碍在内的“全球认知”因素占差异的18.33%。 “睡眠和运动症状”因素,包括睡眠-觉醒周期障碍;妄想幻觉,运动躁动,运动迟缓逆转和情感能力等知觉障碍占方差的16%。思维和语言过程,短暂发作和症状波动可解释13%的差异。结论:因此,当前因素分析不仅证实了ir妄的三个主要症状维度的存在(在先前的几项研究中发现),而且还将这些发现扩展到了通常称为联络精神病学服务的更广泛的患者群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号