...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOMES OF A FACULTY-BASED, PEER REVIEW MANUSCRIPT WRITING WORKSHOP
【24h】

IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOMES OF A FACULTY-BASED, PEER REVIEW MANUSCRIPT WRITING WORKSHOP

机译:基于专业的同行评审稿编写车间的实施和成果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The publication of scholarly work and research findings is an important expectation for nursing faculty; however, academic writing is often neglected, leaving dissemination through manuscript writing an area of concern for the nursing profession. Writing initiatives have been utilized to promote scholarly dissemination in schools of nursing, but those described in the literature have been primarily non-United States based and student focused. This article describes a faculty-based manuscript writing workshop, assesses participants' impressions, and describes its impact on scholarly output. The workshop is a collaborative learning process utilizing peer review to improve manuscript quality and model behaviors for improving writing and peer-reviewing skills. Seventeen workshop participants including three predoctoral students, 6 postdoctoral fellows, and 8 faculty members completed an anonymous workshop survey (81% response rate). All but I of 17 manuscripts reviewed in the workshop are published, accepted, or in the review process. All participants indicated that the workshop was a valuable use of time and would recommend it to colleagues. The greatest reported workshop benefit was its function as an impetus to complete and submit manuscripts. We recommend the manuscript writing workshop model for other schools of nursing seeking ways to expand their scholarly output and create accountability for dissemination through manuscript writing. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:学术著作和研究成果的发表是护理学院的重要期望。但是,学术写作常常被忽略,而通过手稿写作进行传播成为护理界关注的领域。写作活动已被用来促进护理学校的学术传播,但文献中所描述的活动主要基于美国以外的地区,并且以学生为中心。本文介绍了一个基于教师的手稿写作讲习班,评估了参与者的印象,并描述了其对学术成果的影响。该研讨会是一个协作学习过程,利用同行评议来提高手稿质量和模型行为,从而提高写作和同行评议技巧。包括3名博士后学生,6名博士后研究员和8名教职员工在内的17名研讨会参与者完成了匿名研讨会调查(答复率为81%)。在研讨会上审阅的17篇论文中,除第一篇外,所有论文均已出版,接受或在审阅过程中。所有与会者均表示,研讨会是宝贵的时间使用,并将向同事推荐。报告的最大的讲习班利益是它作为完成和提交手稿的动力。我们建议其他护理学校的手稿写作讲习班模式,以寻求方法来扩大其学术成果并建立通过手稿写作传播的责任制。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号