...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >What lies beneath? The underlying principles structuring the field of academic nursing in Ireland.
【24h】

What lies beneath? The underlying principles structuring the field of academic nursing in Ireland.

机译：下面是什么？构成爱尔兰学术护理领域的基本原则。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article reports the findings of a structural analysis of the field of academic nursing in Ireland and considers the implications of the field's current structure for its present status and future trajectory in the academy. Six years after preregistration nursing education transferred to the higher education sector, tensions continue to exist concerning the status and legitimacy of academic nursing and of those who profess to profess it. The languages of legitimation of senior nursing academics and national nursing leaders (n = 16) were elicited and subjected to a critical discourse analysis. Respondents' languages were analyzed in terms of the settings of four underlying structuring legitimation principles: autonomy, density, specialization, and temporality. Academic nursing in Ireland was found to be structured by low autonomy, high density, and weak specialization. I conclude that academic and professional leaders in Irish nursing need to urgently consider how academic nursing can reconfigure its relationships with clinical nursing, increase its intellectual autonomy, enhance its internal coherence and cohesiveness, strengthen the epistemic power of its knowledge base, and critically evaluate the ways in which past practices inform its present and whether and to what extent they should shape its future.
机译：本文报告了爱尔兰学术护理领域结构分析的结果，并考虑了该领域的当前结构对其在学院中的现状和未来轨迹的影响。在预注册护理教育转移到高等教育部门的六年后，关于学术护理和自称的人的地位和合法性继续存在紧张关系。提出了高级护理学者和国家护理领导者（n = 16）的合法语言，并对其进行了批判性话语分析。受访者的语言是根据四个基本的结构化合法性原则的设置来分析的：自治性，密度，专业性和时间性。发现爱尔兰的学术护理由自治程度低，密度高和专业化程度低构成。我得出的结论是，爱尔兰护理学界的学术和专业领导者需要紧急考虑大学护理学如何重新配置​​其与临床护理学的关系，提高其智力自主性，增强其内部连贯性和凝聚力，增强其知识库的认知能力，并对其进行批判性评估。过去的实践如何告知当前情况，以及是否以及在何种程度上影响其未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号