• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Igniting interest in prevention: Using firefighter focus groups to inform implementation and enhancement of an Urban canvassing program
【24h】

Igniting interest in prevention: Using firefighter focus groups to inform implementation and enhancement of an Urban canvassing program

机译：引起人们对预防的兴趣：利用消防员焦点小组为实施和加强城市拉票计划提供信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Context: Smoke alarm canvassing is recognized as an empirically based, effective intervention for increasing access to and the presence of smoke alarms in homes. Objectives: We sought to inform the implementation of an intervention designed to enhance an existing fire department smoke alarm canvassing program through an empirically grounded, participatory process. Design: We conducted a series of focus groups with fire union leaders and firefighters involved with the canvassing program in 1 US city, shared the results with the participants, and presented the resulting recommendations to fire department leadership. Setting: This research occurred in Baltimore, Maryland. Participants: Focus group participants included firefighters who participate in the Fire Department's smoke alarm canvassing program and representatives from the local firefighters' union. Main Outcome Measures: The focus groups sought to capture firefighters' experiences with and opinions about the canvassing program and how to improve it as well as challenges to canvassing work. Results: We conducted 10 focus groups with 65 participants. Firefighters' perspectives on the canvassing program and their recommendations for improving it were expressed through 3 categories of themes concerning program management, canvassing challenges, and attitudes about the program and the community. We also discuss the process of presenting these findings and recommendations to the participants and the fire department leadership, and describe how implementation of some of the recommendations has progressed. Conclusions: Both the process and outcomes of this formative work inform how to develop and implement community-based public health interventions in real-world settings through academic-community partnerships. The findings also have implications for how canvassing programs are being implemented.
机译：背景信息：烟雾警报布告被认为是一种基于经验的有效干预措施，可以增加烟雾警报器在家庭中的使用率并增加其存在。目标：我们试图通过一项以经验为基础的参与性过程，为旨在增强现有消防部门烟雾报警器调查计划的一项干预措施的实施提供信息。设计：我们与参与美国一个城市的拉票计划的消防联盟负责人和消防员进行了一系列焦点小组讨论，与参与者分享了结果，并向消防部门领导提出了建议。地点：这项研究发生在马里兰州的巴尔的摩。参与者：焦点小组参与者包括参加消防局烟雾报警布告计划的消防员以及当地消防员工会的代表。主要成果措施：焦点小组试图捕捉消防员对拉票计划的经验和意见，以及如何改善拉票计划以及对拉票工作的挑战。结果：我们进行了10个焦点小组，有65名参与者。消防员对拉票程序的观点及其改进建议通过以下三类主题表达：程序管理，拉票挑战以及对程序和社区的态度。我们还将讨论向参与者和消防部门领导介绍这些发现和建议的过程，并描述一些建议的实施情况。结论：这项形成性工作的过程和结果都说明了如何通过学术界与社区的合作，在现实环境中开发和实施基于社区的公共卫生干预措施。调查结果还对如何实施拉票程序产生了影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号