首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Aligning public health spending and priorities in Oklahoma.
【24h】

Aligning public health spending and priorities in Oklahoma.

机译:调整俄克拉荷马州的公共卫生支出和优先事项。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All-state fiscal year 2005 public health-related spending in the state of Oklahoma was investigated including funds from federal, state, and local sources expended through the state health department and the two autonomous metropolitan health departments. METHODOLOGY: The cost finding and allocation methodology used a series of structured resource worksheets developed for this project that segregate public health department expenditures into six primary groups: disease and prevention; family health; community health; protective health; support and administrative services; and other. The six primary groups were further divided into 59 units and subunits. All financial data were provided directly by staff in the public health agencies working closely with project staff. The data were analyzed along three lines: (1) level of health department (state, metro, other local); (2) revenue source (federal, state, local); and (3) public health function (behaviors, health conditions, direct services, population health). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Public health officials may not have necessary information on the multiple sources and applications of revenue, categories of expense, operational control of resources, and the inherent restrictions upon the use of those resources. The study gave the city-county and state health officials a new and more complete picture of public health spending in Oklahoma, which catalyzed a dialogue between the commissioner and the directors to explore ways for local priorities to be incorporated into the direct state spending.
机译:对俄克拉荷马州2005财政年度全州与公共卫生相关的支出进行了调查,其中包括来自联邦,州和地方的资金,这些资金是通过州卫生部门和两个自治都市卫生部门支出的。方法:成本发现和分配方法使用了针对该项目开发的一系列结构化资源工作表,该工作表将公共卫生部门的支出分为六个主要类别:疾病和预防;家庭健康;社区卫生;保护健康;支持和行政服务;和别的。六个主要组进一步分为59个单位和亚单位。所有财务数据都是由公共卫生机构的工作人员与项目人员密切合作直接提供的。数据从三方面进行了分析:(1)卫生部门的水平(州,地铁,其他地方); (2)收入来源(联邦,州,地方); (3)公共卫生职能(行为,健康状况,直接服务,人口健康)。结果与结论:公共卫生官员可能没有必要的信息来了解收入的多种来源和应用,费用类别,资源的运营控制以及对这些资源使用的固有限制。该研究为市县和州卫生官员提供了俄克拉荷马州公共卫生支出的新的,更完整的图景,这激发了专员与董事之间的对话,以探讨将地方优先事项纳入直接州支出的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号