...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >A critique of 'new' rural local governance: The case of gender in a rural Australian setting
【24h】

A critique of 'new' rural local governance: The case of gender in a rural Australian setting

机译：对“新的”农村地方治理的批评：澳大利亚农村地区的性别案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the past decade rural social scientists have demonstrated significant interest in documenting the new forms of governance emerging in rural and regional areas. However, little attention has been given to examining the gendered aspects of these new arrangements. This paper takes up the issue of gender and governance in rural areas by reporting on the establishment, membership and practices of a new governing organisation in a local government area in a small rural township in Australia. Men holdalmost all positions on the 19-member board of this institution charged with facilitating development in the shire. This is not surprising, given women's exclusion from the male-dominated networks from which appointees are selected. While this numericaldominance is important, it is not just the presence of men's bodies that is of concern to this paper. Also of interest is the way in which hegemonic discourses of masculinity are privileged by board members. This includes an emphasis on competition, entrepreneurialism, and aggression, and a focus on economic concerns over and above social issues. In conclusion, there may be a lot that is 'new' in the governance of contemporary Western rural nations, but what is not is that these forms of governance aregendered, just as the traditional state has always been, in a way that excludes women and feminine subjectivities.
机译：在过去的十年中，农村社会科学家对记录农村和区域性新兴治理形式表现出极大的兴趣。但是，很少注意研究这些新安排的性别方面。本文通过报告澳大利亚一个农村小乡镇的地方政府区域中新的治理组织的成立，成员和做法，探讨了农村地区的性别与治理问题。在该机构的19位董事会中，男性几乎担任所有职务，负责促进该郡的发展。鉴于妇女被排除在从男性中选拔人选的网络之外，这不足为奇。尽管这一数字优势很重要，但本文所关注的不仅是人体的存在。同样令人感兴趣的是董事会成员享有男性主义霸权话语的特权。这包括对竞争，企业家精神和侵略的重视，以及对社会问题之上的经济关注。总而言之，当代西方农村国家的治理中可能有很多“新”事物，但事实并非如此，这些治理形式是性别平等的，就像传统的国家一贯一样，以排斥女性和女性的方式存在。女性的主观性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号