...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Fiscal conservatism versus local paternalism: divergent experiences of public housing decline in rural areas of England during the 1980s
【24h】

Fiscal conservatism versus local paternalism: divergent experiences of public housing decline in rural areas of England during the 1980s

机译：财政保守主义与地方家长主义：1980年代英格兰农村地区公共住房下降的不同经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper examines the differential response of two rural districts of England (Fenland and Waveney) to changes in council house provisioning in the 1980s. It is situated in a decade when major policy shifts in social housing policy were occurring atthe national level with local governments devising new social housing strategies in response. Against a fast moving legislative background, the study examines the extent to which Stoker's categorisation of policy-making behaviour helps us to understandthe diversity of policy-making influences at work in rural areas. In displaying a resentment of outside influence and a vision grounded in local considerations that offered minimal support for housing association activity, both Fenland and Waveney both exhibited attributes of what Stoker (The Politics of Local Government, second ed., 1991, Macmillan, London) called a 'traditionalist', Conservative stance. However, contrasts in the social housing policy of each authority over the decade revealed the limitations of this categorisation. In Fenland, pressures for housing growth led to increasing problems for those on low-incomes. Nevertheless, the District's social housing policy was dominated by fiscal conservatism and a reluctance to maintain financial support for either construction or the maintenance of council housing. By contrast, the social housing policies adopted by Waveney were characterised by a paternalistic desire to maintain a higher level of support for council housing combined with a moreovertly critical attitude of central government policy. By identifying different dimensions of 'traditionalist' Conservative behaviour, the paper underscores the need for further studies on the role played by local leadership and key actors in policy-making processes.
机译：本文研究了英格兰两个农村地区（芬兰和韦弗尼）对1980年代议会房屋供应变化的不同反应。十年来，国家在社会住房政策方面发生了重大政策转变，地方政府为此制定了新的社会住房战略。在快速发展的立法背景下，该研究考察了斯托克对决策行为的分类在多大程度上有助于我们理解农村地区工作中决策影响的多样性。芬兰德和韦弗尼都表现出对外部影响的不满和基于当地考虑因素的远见，对住房协会的活动提供的支持很少，它们都展现了斯托克的特质（《地方政府的政治》，第二版，1991年，伦敦麦克米伦）被称为“传统主义者”的保守立场。然而，十年来每个主管部门的社会住房政策的对比揭示了这种分类的局限性。在芬兰，住房增长的压力导致低收入者的问题日益严重。但是，该区的社会住房政策主要由财政保守主义主导，不愿为建设或维护议会住房维持财政支持。相比之下，韦弗尼（Waveney）采取的社会住房政策的特点是家长式的愿望，希望对议会住房保持更高水平的支持，同时对中央政府政策持更为批判的态度。通过确定“传统主义”保守行为的不同方面，本文强调了需要进一步研究地方领导和关键角色在决策过程中所起的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号