...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology >Celebrities and Medicine: A Potent Combination
【24h】

Celebrities and Medicine: A Potent Combination

机译:名人与医学:强效组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When it comes to health-related concerns, celebrity commercials ;md endorsements have always made me a little nervous. The direct-to-consumer advertisements with known personalities such as Bob Dole for erectile dysfunction or Sally Field for bone health often made me cringe. I couldn'thelp but wonder if television viewers would really understand whether or not the proposed treatment was right for them. Or would they just be swayed by the celebrity exposure and endorsement? The sticky issue of celebrities being paid for their endorsements really should impact the audience's outlook as well, but does it? Yet when Angelina Jolie came out with the very frank story of her potential risk for breast and ovarian cancer due to her BRCA1 mutation status, it really got me thinking. The public and the media paid attention too. Health-care professionals, in particular, have debated the positive aspects of her announcement and the subsequent newspaper and media coverage of the "Angelina Jolie effect" and the "Jolie gene." In terms of health care, has this been a positive or negative development?
机译:当谈到与健康相关的问题时,名人广告; md的代言总是让我有些紧张。知名人物的直接面向消费者的广告(例如勃起功能障碍的鲍勃·多尔(Bob Dole)或骨骼健康的莎莉·菲尔德(Sally Field))经常让我感到沮丧。我忍不住想知道电视观众是否真的了解提议的治疗方法是否适合他们。还是会受到名人曝光和认可的影响?名人因代言而付出的棘手问题确实也应该影响观众的观感,但是,这是吗?然而,当安吉丽娜·朱莉(Angelina Jolie)坦率地讲述了由于她的BRCA1突变状态而可能患乳腺癌和卵巢癌的故事时,这真的让我开始思考。公众和媒体也给予了关注。尤其是医疗保健专业人员,在辩论她的声明的积极方面以及随后的报纸和媒体对“安吉丽娜·朱莉效应”和“朱莉基因”的报道进行了辩论。在医疗保健方面,这是正面的还是负面的发展?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号