...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Mentorship in the context of interdisciplinary geriatric research: Lessons learned from the RAND/Hartford Program for Building Interdisciplinary Geriatric Research Centers
【24h】

Mentorship in the context of interdisciplinary geriatric research: Lessons learned from the RAND/Hartford Program for Building Interdisciplinary Geriatric Research Centers

机译：跨学科老年医学研究的指导：从RAND / Hartford计划建立跨学科老年医学研究中心的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In light of the growing trend toward formalized research mentorship for effectively transmitting the values, standards, and practices of science from one generation of researchers to the next, this article provides the results of an exploratory study. It reports on research mentorship in the context of interdisciplinary geriatric research based on experiences with the RAND/Hartford Program for Building Interdisciplinary Geriatric Research Centers. At the end of the 2-year funding period, staff from the RAND Coordinating Center conducted 60- to 90-minute open-ended telephone interviews with the co-directors of the seven centers. Questions focused on interdisciplinary mentorship activities, barriers to implementing these activities, and strategies for overcoming them, as well as a self-assessment tool with regard to programs, policies, and structures across five domains, developed to encourage research mentorship. In addition, the mentees at the centers were surveyed to assess their experiences with interdisciplinary mentoring and the center. According to the interviewees, some barriers to successful interdisciplinary mentoring included the mentor's lack of time, structural support, and the lack of a clear definition of interdisciplinary research. Most centers had formal policies in place for mentor identification and limited policies on mentor incentives. Mentees uniformly reported their relationships with their mentors as positive. More than 50% of mentees reported having a primary mentor from within their discipline and had more contact with their primary mentor than their secondary mentors. Further research is needed to understand the complexity of institutional levers that emerging programs might employ to encourage and support research mentorship.
机译：鉴于日益趋向于正规的研究指导以有效地将科学的价值，标准和实践从一代研究者传给下一代的趋势，本文提供了探索性研究的结果。它基于RAND / Hartford建设跨学科老年医学研究中心计划的经验，报告了跨学科老年医学研究的研究指导。在为期2年的资助期结束时，兰德（RAND）协调中心的工作人员与七个中心的联合主任进行了60至90分钟的不限成员名额电话采访。这些问题集中在跨学科指导活动，实施这些活动的障碍，克服这些问题的策略以及针对五个领域的计划，政策和结构的自我评估工具，以鼓励研究指导。此外，还对中心的受训者进行了调查，以评估他们在跨学科指导和中心方面的经验。根据受访者的说法，成功进行跨学科指导的一些障碍包括指导者缺乏时间，结构上的支持以及缺乏对跨学科研究的明确定义。大多数中心都有正式的政策来确定导师，而关于导师奖励的政策却很有限。学员一致报告他们与导师的关系是积极的。超过50％的受训者报告称其学科内有一名主要导师，与主要导师的联系比其次要导师更多。需要进一步的研究，以了解新兴计划可能会采用的鼓励和支持研究指导的体制手段的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号