...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Editor's spotlight/take 5: A review of current fixation usage and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: The uncemented paradox [DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7]
【24h】

Editor's spotlight/take 5: A review of current fixation usage and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: The uncemented paradox [DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7]

机译:编者的重点/重点5:全髋关节置换术中当前固定物使用方法和注册表结果的回顾:未粘合的悖论[DOI 10.1007 / s11999-013-2941-7]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study findings presented by Troelsen and colleagues remind me of the book How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life, by Thomas Gilovich [1]. After reading it, I remember thinking the title was more interesting than the book. That is not the case here. The Uncemented Paradox is a catchy title, but the work by Troelsen and colleagues is truly fascinating.
机译:Troelsen及其同事提出的研究发现使我想起了Thomas Gilovich [1]所著的《我们如何知道不是什么:人类理性在日常生活中的易错性》。读完之后,我记得以为标题比书有趣。这里情况不同。 Uncemented Paradox是一个引人注目的标题,但是Troelsen及其同事的作品确实令人着迷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号