...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal Of The South African Institute Of Mining & Metallurgy >What happened to the mechanics in rock mechanics and the geology in engineering geology
【24h】

What happened to the mechanics in rock mechanics and the geology in engineering geology

机译：岩石力学中的力学和工程地质学中的地质发生了什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A good thing is becoming a bad thing. Rock mass classification systems, that arc so excellent for communications between engineers and geologists, and that can be valuable in categorizing project experience, are emasculating engineering geology and rock mechanics. Some engineering geologists have been sucked into thinking that Q and RMR values are all that is needed for engineering purposes, and seem to have put aside what can be learned from structural geology and geomorphology. Many rock mechanics engineers seem to have forgotten the scientific method. This paper attempts to redress the situation by showing how mechanics can be used in rock engineering to design with a similar rigour to that used in the fields of structural engineering, hydraulics and soil mechanics. It also attempts to remind practitioners of what can be achieved by skilled engineering geology.
机译：好事变成坏事。岩体分类系统非常适合工程地质学和岩石力学，这种岩体分类系统非常适合工程师与地质学家之间的通信，并且在分类项目经验方面可能非常有价值。一些工程地质学家被认为Q和RMR值是工程目的所必需的，并且似乎已经把从结构地质和地貌学中可以学到的东西放在一边。许多岩石力学工程师似乎已经忘记了科学方法。本文试图通过显示如何在岩石工程中使用力学来设计与结构工程，水力学和土壤力学领域类似的严格性来纠正这种情况。它还试图提醒从业人员，熟练的工程地质学可以实现什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号