...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of women’s health >Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender.
【24h】

Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender.

机译：基于性别的编辑委员会审稿人行为上的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Reports indicate that there are gender-based differences in aspects of the peer-review process. METHODS: This is an analysis of editorial board members' reviews of original research submissions based on gender using the web-based management program, Editorial Manager, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2008. We evaluated recommendations of editorial board members for acceptance/rejection using a four-tier system, agreement with editor's final decision, turnaround time from review request to submission, and editors' grades of reviews on a 5-point scale. We evaluated the performance of editorial board members with advancing tenure, seeking trends in recommendations over time. RESULTS: We included 6062 manuscript reviews representing 5958 manuscripts; 67% were assigned to male editorial board members and 33% to females. There were 38 editorial board members (25 men, 13 women) with tenure duration from 2 to 4.9 years, and 3 editors (2 men, 1 woman) serving 7, 7, and 6 years, respectively. Women were less likely to accept or accept with minor revisions than men (p < 0.003). Median turnaround times were 14 (0-55) days for women and 10 (0-33) days for men (p < 0.001). The editors' grades assigned to women were more often than men's grades in the very good to exceptional category (p < 0.0001). There was no difference based on gender, with approximately 73% decision congruence overall with the editors' final decisions. Men rejected more manuscripts than did women with advancing tenure on the editorial board (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There are differences based on gender of editorial board members' recommendations about manuscript triage, turnaround time, and editors' grades assigned. Overall, however, these differences do not affect editors' ultimate decisions about manuscript publication.
机译：背景：报告表明，同行评审过程的各个方面存在基于性别的差异。方法：这是从2002年1月1日至2008年12月31日使用基于网络的管理程序，社论经理对编辑委员会成员对基于性别的原始研究论文的评论进行的分析。我们评估了编辑委员会成员针对以下方面的建议：使用四层系统的接受/拒绝，同意编辑的最终决定，从审阅请求到提交的周转时间，以及编辑对审稿的评分为5分制。我们评估了任期不断延长的编委会成员的表现，以期寻求建议的发展趋势。结果：我们纳入了6062篇论文评论，代表5958篇论文。 67％被分配给男性编辑委员会成员，33％被分配给女性。任期从2年到4.9年的38个编辑委员会成员（25名男性，13名女性），以及分别任职7年，7年和6年的3名编辑（2名男性，1名女性）。与男性相比，女性接受或稍加修改的可能性较小（p <0.003）。女性的中位数周转时间为14（0-55）天，男性为10（0-33）天（p <0.001）。在非常好至优秀的类别中，分配给女性的编辑评分通常比男性的评分更高（p <0.0001）。基于性别没有差异，总体上约73％的决策与编辑的最终决定相一致。在编辑委员会中任职期延长的男性比女性拒绝更多的手稿（p <0.0001）。结论：根据编辑委员会成员关于稿件分类，周转时间和分配的编辑职等的性别建议，存在差异。总体而言，这些差异不会影响编辑者对手稿出版的最终决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号