• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational rehabilitation >Developing research on performance-based functional work assessment: Report on the first international functional capacity evaluation research meeting
【24h】

Developing research on performance-based functional work assessment: Report on the first international functional capacity evaluation research meeting

机译：开展基于绩效的职能工作评估研究：第一次国际职能能力评估研究会议的报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction Research on Performance-Based Work Assessment, also known as Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE), has evolved substantially over the past decades. Although this field of research has developed, the use of FCE has been an object of discussion and debate internationally. Unfortunately, there has been no platform or infrastructure available for FCE researchers to present their research, discuss, and collaborate. Methods An International FCE Research Meeting was held in Haren, The Netherlands on October 25, 2012, with 48 participants from eight countries. The meeting consisted of presentation of new research, two debates, and an open discussion that aimed at creating an overview of gaps in research as identified by the participants. Results The discussion resulted in the identification of 17 research needs, which are listed in this paper. Important categories were: further validation of FCE across settings, jurisdictions and patient groups; additional impact and cost-effectiveness evaluation of FCE compared to alternatives; and the use of ICF as guiding framework. Conclusion Researchers, clinicians, and other professionals in the FCE area are interested in improving the quality and content of FCE research by setting a common set of priorities and creating an international peer network.
机译：简介在过去的几十年中，基于绩效的工作评估（也称为功能能力评估（FCE））的研究有了长足的发展。尽管这一研究领域已经发展起来，但FCE的使用已成为国际上讨论和辩论的对象。不幸的是，FCE研究人员没有可用的平台或基础设施来介绍他们的研究，讨论和合作。方法2012年10月25日，国际FCE研究会议在荷兰哈伦举行，来自8个国家的48名与会者参加了会议。会议包括新研究的介绍，两次辩论和一次公开讨论，目的是概述与会人员确定的研究差距。结果讨论确定了17个研究需求，在本文中列出了这些需求。重要的类别是：跨场所，辖区和患者群体的FCE进一步验证;与替代方案相比，FCE的附加影响和成本效益评估;以及使用ICF作为指导框架。结论FCE领域的研究人员，临床医生和其他专业人员对通过设置共同的优先重点和建立国际对等网络来提高FCE研究的质量和内容感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号