Reflections on the Disciplinary Gulf between the Natural and Social Sciences

Susan Wright

首页> 外文期刊>Community genetics >Reflections on the Disciplinary Gulf between the Natural and Social Sciences

【24h】

Reflections on the Disciplinary Gulf between the Natural and Social Sciences

机译：对自然科学与社会科学之间的学科海湾的思考

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The general purpose of this essay is to explore key features of the disciplinary gulf between the natural and social sciences, and, in particular, differences in fundamental assumptions concerning the nature and purpose of knowledge. The essay contrasts the claims of the natural sciences to objectivity and universality with those of the social sciences, especially the qualitative social sciences, to the historical and cultural contingency of knowledge. It examines the ways in which the use of two 'key words' - 'expertise' and 'responsibility' - serves to maintain the disciplinary gulf by reinforcing assumptions concerning the neutrality and technical nature of scientific knowledge and how those concepts marginalize social and ethical dimensions to create a politically influential hierarchy of knowledge claims.

机译：本文的总体目的是探讨自然科学和社会科学之间学科鸿沟的关键特征，尤其是关于知识的性质和目的的基本假设上的差异。本文将自然科学对客观性和普遍性的主张与社会科学，特别是定性社会科学的主张与知识的历史和文化偶然性进行了对比。它探讨了通过使用关于科学知识的中立性和技术性的假设以及这些概念如何使社会和道德层面边缘化的两个“关键词”（专业知识和责任）的使用来保持学科鸿沟的方式。建立具有政治影响力的知识主张层次结构。

著录项

来源
《Community genetics》 |2006年第3期|共9页
作者
Susan Wright;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类力学;
关键词
Social responsibility; Natural sciences; Disciplinary gulf;

机译：社会责任;自然科学;学科鸿沟;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reflections on the Disciplinary Gulf between the Natural and Social Sciences [J] . Susan Wright Community genetics . 2006,第3期

机译：对自然科学与社会科学之间的学科海湾的思考
2. THE DISCIPLINARY WORK OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES [J] . The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies . 2020,第2期

机译：社会科学的纪律处
3. Revisiting the Belmont Report's ethical principles in internet-mediated research: perspectives from disciplinary associations in the social sciences [J] . Fresno Anabo Icy, Elexpuru-Albizuri Iciar, Villardon-Gallego Lourdes Ethics and information technology . 2019,第2期

机译：在互联网媒介研究中重新审视《贝尔蒙特报告》的道德原则：社会科学学科协会的观点
4. Studying Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Sociality in Natural Sciences, Engineering, and Social Sciences: Possibility and Reality [C] . Andrey V. REZAEV, Anastasia A. IVANOVA World multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics . 2018

机译：研究自然科学，工程学和社会科学中的人工智能和人工社会：可能性和现实
5. Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogical Content Knowledge (DLPCK) Today: An Exploration of the Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Middle and High School Science, Social Studies, and English Langauage Arts Teachers [D] . Saraceno, Linda M. 2019

机译：当今的学科素养教学内容知识（DLPCK）：对中，高中科学，社会研究和英语语言艺术老师的学科素养教学内容知识的探索
6. Where Does the Circle End?: Representation as a Critical Aspect of Reflection in Teaching Social and Behavioral Sciences in Medicine [O] . Michael J. Devlin, Boyd F. Richards, Hetty Cunningham, -1

机译：圈子在哪里结束？：在医学社会与行为科学教学中代表性是反思的重要方面
7. Social technologies:Cross-disciplinary reflections on technologies in and from the social sciences Introduction [O] . Derksen Maarten, Vikkelso Signe, Beaulieu Anne 2012

机译：社会技术：对社会科学中的技术的跨学科思考引言
8. National Security Challenges: Insights from Social, Neurobiological, and Complexity Sciences. Topical Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) and U.S. Army ERDC Multi-Agency/Multi-Disciplinary White Papers in Support of National Security Challenges. [R] . 2012

机译：国家安全挑战：来自社会，神经生物学和复杂性科学的见解。专题战略多层评估（sma）和美国陆军ERDC多机构/多学科白皮书支持国家安全挑战。

Reflections on the Disciplinary Gulf between the Natural and Social Sciences

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅