首页> 外文期刊>自然灾害科学 >がけ崩れ災害対策における住民の 意思決定に至るパス解析
【24h】

がけ崩れ災害対策における住民の 意思決定に至るパス解析

机译:导致居民决策的滑坡灾害对策路径分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpuses of this study are to investigate risk perception and decision making of inhabitants against landslide measures in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Pref. where steep sloping land were developed as residential zone and large number of landslide disasters have been observed around Kanto Area. In order to clarify them, questionary surveys have been implemented to 3,800 householeds. In this survey, firstly information about landslide risk based on past recored disasters in the districts is shown to inhabitants. Secondary alternative measures to clarify the decision making process which led to landslide measures practice every three attributes, below average income, more than average income, and whole respondent by pass analysis. As a result, pass analysis shows that (a) The process to lead to evasion intention in below average income group are different from more than average income group. Especailly risk acceptance is the key factor to decide evasion intention. In below average income group, it means trust to attitude of public sector, on the contrary risk acceptance means zero risk thinking in more than average income group. Inverse correlation is observed between risk acceptance and evasion intention in both groups. (b) Envasion mesures are supposed to be established based on considering differences of the intention to implement evasion mesures and effects of risk acceptance. In both groups, supports of decision making in protection of steep sloping land mesures is essential.(c) It is clarified that making incentives to removal of their housing and casual insurances are required for below average income group, meanwhile expanding present subsidis to control landslide is important for more than average income group with enlightenment not to be zero risk thinking.
机译:本研究的目的是调查神奈川县横须贺市居民对滑坡措施的风险感知和决策。在关东地区开发了陡峭的坡地作为居民区,并观察到大量的滑坡灾害。为了澄清这些问题,已经对3800个家庭进行了问卷调查。在本次调查中,首先向居民显示了基于该地区过去发生的重灾而产生的滑坡风险信息。次要替代措施旨在澄清决策过程,从而导致滑坡措施实践了三个属性,即低于平均收入,高于平均收入和整个受访者通行证分析。结果,通过分析表明:(a)低于平均收入组的逃避意图的过程不同于高于平均收入组的逃避意图的过程。尤其是风险接受度是决定逃避意图的关键因素。在低于平均收入水平的人群中,这意味着对公共部门态度的信任,相反,在高于平均收入水平的人群中,风险接受意味着零风险思维。两组的风险接受度和逃避意愿之间均呈负相关。 (b)应当基于考虑到实施逃避措施的意图的差异和风险接受的影响来确定入侵的措施。在这两个群体中,都必须有决策支持来保护陡坡土地。(c)明确指出,对于中等收入以下群体,需要采取激励措施来拆除住房和临时保险,同时扩大现有补贴以控制滑坡对于大多数人而言,重要的是要启迪不要成为零风险思维。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号