首页> 外文期刊>Climatic Change >A tale of two population crises in recent Chinese history
【24h】

A tale of two population crises in recent Chinese history

机译:关于中国近代史上两次人口危机的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The fall of the Ming dynasty in the first half of the 17th century and the Taiping Rebellion from 1851-1864 were two of the most chaotic periods in Chinese history, and each was accompanied by large-scale population collapses. The 'Kang-Qian Golden Age' (also known as 'High Qing'), during which population size expanded rapidly, falls in between the two. Scholars remain divided in their opinions concerning the above alternation of population growth and decline as to whether variations in population size or climate change should be identified as the root cause. In either case, the synergistic impact of population growth and climate change upon population growth dynamics is overlooked. In the present study, we utilized high-resolution empirical data, qualitative survey, statistical comparison and time-series analysis to investigate how the two factors worked synergistically to drive population cycles in 1600-1899. To facilitate our research, we posited a set of simplified pathways for population growth in historical agrarian China. Our results confirm that the interrelation between population growth, climate change and population crises in recent Chinese history basically followed our posited pathways. The recurrences of population crises were largely determined by the combination of population growth and climate change. Our results challenge classic Malthusian/post-Malthusian interpretations and historians' views of historical Chinese population cycles.
机译:17世纪上半叶的明朝灭亡和1851-1864年的太平天国起义是中国历史上最混乱的两个时期,每个时期都伴随着大规模的人口崩溃。人口规模迅速扩大的“康迁黄金时代”(也称为“高清时代”)介于两者之间。关于上述人口增长和下降的变化,学者们仍意见分歧,是否应该确定人口规模或气候变化是根本原因。无论哪种情况,都忽略了人口增长和气候变化对人口增长动态的协同影响。在本研究中,我们利用高分辨率的经验数据,定性调查,统计比较和时间序列分析来研究这两个因素如何协同工作以推动1600-1899年的人口周期。为了促进我们的研究,我们提出了一套简化的方法,以促进历史耕种中国的人口增长。我们的结果证实,在最近的中国历史中,人口增长,气候变化与人口危机之间的相互关系基本上遵循我们的假设路径。人口危机的复发在很大程度上取决于人口增长与气候变化的结合。我们的研究结果挑战了经典的马尔萨斯/后马尔萨斯的解释,以及历史学家对中国历史人口周期的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号