...
首页> 外文期刊>Climatic Change >Contraction and convergence: an assessment of the CCOptions model
【24h】

Contraction and convergence: an assessment of the CCOptions model

机译:收缩与收敛:CCOptions模型的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Well before President Putin ratified the Kyoto Protocol, the debate had begun as to the appropriate form of any post-Kyoto agreement. Amongst the emission reduction regimes being considered is that of Contraction and Convergence; conceived by GlobalCommons Institute (GCI) as a practical interpretation of the philosophy that every adult on the planet has an equal right to emit greenhouse gases. To support the Contraction and Convergence regime, the GCI have developed a computer model, CCOptions, tocorrelate CO stabilisation levels with global, regional and national carbon reduction targets. This paper analyses the model, concluding that, whilst the aim of CCOptions is laudable, the application of the model in its current form is unnecessarily ambitious and as a consequence potentially misleading to all but the well-informed user.
机译:在普京总统批准《京都议定书》之前,关于任何后京都协议的适当形式的辩论已经开始。在考虑减少排放的制度中,有收缩和收敛制度。由GlobalCommons Institute(GCI)提出,是对地球上每个成年人都有平等的排放温室气体权的哲学的实际解释。为了支持收缩和收敛机制,GCI开发了计算机模型CCOptions,以使CO稳定水平与全球,区域和国家的碳减排目标相关联。本文分析了该模型,得出结论,尽管CCOptions的目标值得称赞,但以当前形式应用该模型不必要地雄心勃勃,因此可能会误导所有知情的用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号