...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Climatic Change >Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU's budget approach
【24h】

Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU's budget approach

机译：平等，正义与可行性：对WBGU预算方法的伦理分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

According to the Budget Approach proposed by the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), allocating CO2 emission rights to countries on an equal per-capita basis would provide an ethically justified response to global climate change. In this paper, we will highlight four normative issues which beset the WBGU's Budget Approach: (1) the approach's core principle of distributive justice, the principle of equality, and its associated policy of emissions egalitarianism are much more complex than it initially appears; (2) the "official" rationale for determining the size of the budget should be modified in order to avoid implausible normative assumptions about the imposition of permissible intergenerational risks; (3) the approach heavily relies on trade-offs between justice and feasibility which should be stated more explicitly; and (4) part of the approach's ethical appeal depends on policy instruments which are "detachable" from the approach's core principle of distributive justice.
机译：根据德国全球变化咨询委员会（WBGU）提出的预算方法，将二氧化碳排放权按人均分配给各个国家，这将在伦理上对全球气候变化做出合理回应。在本文中，我们将重点介绍困扰WBGU预算方法的四个规范性问题：（1）该方法的分配正义的核心原则，平等原则及其相关的排放均等主义政策比起初看起来要复杂得多; （2）应该修改确定预算规模的“官方”理由，以避免对施加可允许的代际风险进行不合理的规范性假设; （3）该方法在很大程度上依赖于正义与可行性之间的权衡，应在此做出更明确的说明; （4）该方法的道德诉求的一部分取决于与该方法的分配正义核心原则“可分离”的政策工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号