首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental allergy : >Exposure to ‘farming’ and objective markers of atopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Exposure to ‘farming’ and objective markers of atopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:暴露于“农业”和特应性疾病的客观标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is growing interest in the farm effect on the spectrum of allergy. Evidence concerning the farm effect on asthma, eczema, and allergic rhinitis has been systematically synthesized, but without a specific focus on objective markers of sensitization. This focus is important, as farm exposures may be related to allergy but not to non-allergic phenotypes of disease. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse literature that has investigated associations between farm exposure at any age and objective measures of atopy, that is serum IgE or skin prick tests results. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 29 articles for review. IgE levels were measured in either childhood or adulthood by eighteen studies, while skin prick testing was performed in sixteen studies. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessments indicated that the majority of these studies demonstrated a representative sample of selected participants. Due to significant heterogeneity in study measures and methodology between studies, only few were meta-analysed. This meta-analysis showed a significant protective effect of farm exposure before 1 year of life on allergic sensitization (OR = 0.60 [0.520.70]). Farm exposure during childhood was also associated with a reduced risk of sensitization to cat or timothy (OR = 0.60 [0.510.70]; OR=0.46 [0.410.51]). Studies investigating the effect of farm exposure in adult life could not be meta-analysed, and their results were inconsistent. Insufficient studies investigated food sensitization as an outcome to allow synthesis. The majority of studies included in this review investigated childhood farm exposure, finding evidence to support a protective childhood farm effect against subsequent atopy. There is inconsistent evidence on the association between farm exposure in adulthood and allergic sensitization. Further studies are needed to tease out the exact exposures and timing associated with farming environments that protect against allergic disease.
机译:人们对农场对过敏谱的影响越来越感兴趣。关于农场对哮喘,湿疹和变应性鼻炎的作用的证据已经被系统地合成,但是没有特别关注致敏性的客观指标。此重点很重要,因为农场暴露可能与过敏相关,但与疾病的非过敏表型无关。我们旨在系统地回顾和进行荟萃分析的文献,这些文献调查了任何年龄的农场暴露与特应性客观测量(即血清IgE或皮肤点刺试验结果)之间的关联。使用预定义的纳入和排除标准,我们确定了29篇文章进行审查。通过18项研究测量了儿童期或成年期的IgE水平,而在16项研究中进行了皮肤点刺测试。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的质量评估表明,这些研究中的大多数证明了选定参与者的代表性样本。由于研究方法和研究方法之间的显着异质性,因此仅进行了荟萃分析。这项荟萃分析显示,暴露前1年的农场暴露对过敏性致敏具有显着的保护作用(OR = 0.60 [0.520.70])。儿童时期的农场暴露也与降低对猫或提摩太美致敏的风险相关(OR = 0.60 [0.510.70]; OR = 0.46 [0.410.51])。不能荟萃分析调查农场暴露对成年生活的影响的研究,并且结果不一致。不足的研究调查了食物致敏作为合成的结果。该评价中包括的大多数研究调查了童年农场的暴露情况,发现了证据证明了童年农场对随后的特应性的保护作用。关于成年农场暴露与过敏致敏之间关联的证据不一致。需要进行进一步的研究以弄清与防止过敏性疾病的农业环境相关的确切暴露时间和时机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号