...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Comparing and Integrating Community-Based and Science-Based Approaches to Prioritizing Marine Areas for Protection
【24h】

Comparing and Integrating Community-Based and Science-Based Approaches to Prioritizing Marine Areas for Protection

机译：比较和整合基于社区和基于科学的方法来优先保护海洋区域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We compared and integrated marine protected areas proposed through community and scientific assessments in 2 regions of British Columbia, Canada. The community priorities were identified during individual and group interviews with knouledgeable resource users. The scientific priorities were developed with abiotic and biotic data in Marxan, a decision-support tool. The resulting maps of community-based and science-based priorities were very similar for the inshore areas, which lent credibility to both approaches. The resource users thought the science-based maps were fairly good at highlighting areas important for conservation, but preferred the scenarios that integrated the 2 maps to either constituent map. Incorporating spatial variation in human impacts on the marine areas and commercial fishing, which are both costs of proleclion, into our Marxan analyses led to scenarios that were different from either constituent map. Our results show the value of integrating community-based and science-based approaches in conservation planning to achieve community acceptance and conservation utility. They also reveal that people's assessments on the basis of their traditional ecological knowledge may serve as a reasonable proxy for scientific approaches in selecting areas of ecological value.
机译：我们比较并整合了通过社区和科学评估在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省两个地区提出的海洋保护区。在与知识渊博的资源用户进行个人和小组访谈时，确定了社区优先级。科学优先级是通过决策支持工具Marxan中的非生物和生物数据制定的。由此产生的以社区为基础和以科学为基础的优先重点地图在沿海地区非常相似，这两种方法都具有可信度。资源用户认为基于科学的地图在突出显示对保护重要的区域方面相当擅长，但是更喜欢将两个地图集成到任一组成地图中的方案。将人类对海洋地区和商业捕鱼的影响的空间变化（这两者都是prolclion的代价）纳入我们的马克思主义分析中，从而得出了与两种构成图都不相同的场景。我们的结果表明，在保护规划中整合基于社区和基于科学的方法以实现社区认可和保护效用的价值。他们还揭示了人们在传统生态知识的基础上进行的评估可以作为选择生态价值领域的科学方法的合理替代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号