...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Identifying Reefs of Hope and Hopeful Actions: Contextualizing Environmental, Ecological, and Social Parameters to Respond Effectively to Climate Change
【24h】

Identifying Reefs of Hope and Hopeful Actions: Contextualizing Environmental, Ecological, and Social Parameters to Respond Effectively to Climate Change

机译：确定希望和希望采取的行动的礁石：结合环境，生态和社会参数，有效应对气候变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Priorities for conservation, management, and associated activities will differ based on the interplay between nearness of ecosystems to full recovery from a disturbance (pristineness), susceptibility to climate change (environmental susceptibility [ES]), and capacity of human communities to cope with and adapt to change (social adaptive capacity [AC]). We studied 24 human communities and adjacent coral reef ecosystems in 5 countries of the southwestern Indian Ocean. We used ecological measures of abundance and diversity of fishes and corals, estimated reef pristineness, and conducted socioeconomic household surveys to determine the AC of communities adjacent to selected coral reefs. We also used Web-based oceanographic and coral mortality data to predict each site's ES to climate warming. Coral reefs of Mauritius and eastern Madagascar had low ES and consequently were not predicted to be affected strongly by warm water, although these sites were differentiated by the AC of the human community. The higher AC in Mauritius may increase the chances for successful self-initiated recovery and protective management of reefs of this island. In contrast, Madagascar may require donor support to build AC as a prerequisite to preservation efforts. The Seychelles and Kenya had high ES, but their levels of AC and disturbance differed. The high AC in the Seychelles could be used to develop alternatives to dependence on coral reef resources and reduce the effects of climate change. Pristineness weighted toward measures of fish recovery was greatest for Kenya's marine protected areas; however, most protected areas in the region were far from pristine. Conservation priorities and actions with realistic chances for success require knowledge of where socioecological systems lie among the 3 axes of environment, ecology, and society.
机译：保护，管理和相关活动的优先级将因生态系统接近从干扰中完全恢复（原始），对气候变化的敏感性（环境敏感性[ES]）以及人类社区应对和应对能力之间的相互作用而有所不同。适应变化（社会适应能力[AC]）。我们研究了印度洋西南部5个国家的24个人类社区和邻近的珊瑚礁生态系统。我们使用了鱼类和珊瑚的丰富度和多样性的生态措施，估计的珊瑚礁原始程度，并进行了社会经济家庭调查，以确定与选定珊瑚礁相邻的社区的适应气候变化。我们还使用基于Web的海洋和珊瑚死亡率数据来预测每个站点对气候变暖的ES。毛里求斯和马达加斯加东部的珊瑚礁ES偏低，因此虽然人类住所的AC区分了这些地点，但预计它们不会受到温水的强烈影响。毛里求斯的最高AC可能会增加成功进行该岛的自我恢复和保护性管理的机会。相反，马达加斯加可能需要捐助者的支持来建立交流中心，这是保存努力的前提。塞舌尔和肯尼亚的ES高，但他们的AC和干扰水平有所不同。塞舌尔的高空调可用于开发替代方案，以替代对珊瑚礁资源的依赖并减少气候变化的影响。对于肯尼亚的海洋保护区而言，强调鱼类恢复措施的原始感是最大的;但是，该地区大多数保护区都不是原始的。保护优先事项和采取行动并获得成功的现实机会，需要了解社会生态系统在环境，生态和社会三个轴心中的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号