• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Effectiveness in conservation practice: Pointers from medicine and public health
【24h】

Effectiveness in conservation practice: Pointers from medicine and public health

机译：保护实践的有效性：医学和公共卫生的指针

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Practical conservation activity is increasing globally and is being undertaken by many different government and nongovernmental organizations. In the majority of cases, justification for proposed actions is experience-based rather than evidence-based, action is often taken without monitoring or evaluation of effectiveness and results are rarely widely disseminated. Conservation has been compared with medicine as a crisis discipline in which action is often required urgently in the absence of good information. The practice of medicine has recently gone through an effectiveness revolution that has improved the criteria upon which treatment strategies are based by progressing from reliance on personal experience to reliance on scientific evidence. We draw parallels between medicine and conservation and present a practical framework to encourage evidence-based conservation action. Our rationale is that conservation actions for which scarce resources are sought should be justified by good scientific evidence. In our view this will also encourage more research addressing practical issues in conservation management. [References: 16]
机译：实用的保护活动在全球范围内正在增加，并且由许多不同的政府和非政府组织进行。在大多数情况下，提议采取的行动的理由是基于经验的，而不是基于证据的，采取行动时往往没有对有效性进行监测或评估，结果也很少广泛传播。将保护与医学作为一种危机学科进行了比较，因为在缺乏良好信息的情况下，常常急需采取行动。最近，医学实践经历了一场功效革命，通过从依靠个人经验到依靠科学证据的发展，改善了治疗策略所依据的标准。我们在医学和保护之间进行了比较，并提出了一个实用的框架来鼓励基于证据的保护行动。我们的理由是，寻求稀缺资源的保护行动应有充分的科学证据来证明是正确的。我们认为，这也将鼓励更多的研究解决保护管理中的实际问题。 [参考：16]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号