...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral sciences & the law >Aggression, psychopathy and free will from a cognitive neuroscience perspective
【24h】

Aggression, psychopathy and free will from a cognitive neuroscience perspective

机译:从认知神经科学的角度看侵略,心理疾病和自由意志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers the notion of free will in the context of aggression and psychopathy research. The philosophical literature is very briefly considered to determine under what assumptions free will can be considered to exist. However, as the issue of free will is very difficult to address directly, the prime focus of this article is on issues raised in the philosophical debate, that may be empirically tractable and that are relevant to the understanding of psychopathy. Specifically, the following issues are considered: (1) The distinction between automatic and controlled processing; (2) Impairment related to automatic processing in individuals with psychopathy; and (3) Impairment related to controlled behavior in individuals with psychopathy. It is concluded that, while there is not a direct mapping of the automatic versus controlled processing dichotomy on to the reactive versus instrumental aggression dichotomy, some overlap can be considered. As such, it is possible to consider that certain episodes of reactive aggression might be considered to occur in the absence of free will. However, instrumental aggression, at least from a compatibilist perspective, must involve free will. Published in 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:本文在侵略和心理疾病研究的背景下考虑了自由意志的概念。非常简短地考虑了哲学文献,以确定在什么假设下可以认为存在自由意志。但是,由于自由意志的问题很难直接解决,因此本文的主要重点是哲学辩论中提出的问题,这些问题在经验上可能易于处理,并且与对心理疾病的理解有关。具体来说,考虑以下问题:(1)自动处理与受控处理之间的区别; (2)与精神病患者的自动处理有关的障碍; (3)与精神病患者控制行为有关的障碍。结论是,虽然没有将自动处理与受控处理二分法直接映射到反应性与工具性攻击二分法,但可以考虑一些重叠。因此,可以考虑在没有自由意志的情况下发生某些反应性侵略事件。但是,至少从兼容主义者的角度来看,工具性侵略必须涉及自由意志。 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.于2007年出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号