...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior >Selective impairments for addition, subtraction and multiplication. implications for the organisation of arithmetical facts.
【24h】

Selective impairments for addition, subtraction and multiplication. implications for the organisation of arithmetical facts.

机译：加减乘除的选择性损伤。对算术事实的组织意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study reports for the first time a selective impairment for simple addition in patient FS. Moreover, patient VP presented with a selective impairment for simple multiplication and patient DT with a selective impairment for simple subtraction. These findings are discussed in the context of two of the most influential models for the organisation of arithmetical facts in memory (Dehaene and Cohen, 1995, 1997, and Dagenbach and McCloskey, 1992). Dehaene and Cohen (1995, 1997) have proposed that dissociation between arithmetical facts result from a selective impairment to two different types of processing: rote verbal memory for multiplication and simple addition vs. quantity processing for subtraction and division. Dagenbach and McCloskey (1992) suggest dissociation between arithmetical facts result from a selective damage to segregated memory networks specific for each operation. We will argue that our findings are problematic for Dehaene's model and in good accord with McCloskey's view.
机译：这项研究首次报告了简单添加患者FS的选择性损害。此外，患者VP表现为选择性乘法的选择性损伤，患者DT表现为简单减法的选择性损伤。在两个最有影响力的组织算术事实组织模型的背景下讨论了这些发现（Dehaene和Cohen，1995，1997; Dagenbach和McCloskey，1992）。 Dehaene和Cohen（1995，1997）提出算术事实之间的分离是由对两种不同类型处理的选择性损害导致的：死记硬背的口头记忆用于乘法运算和简单加法与数量处理以进行减法和除法运算。 Dagenbach和McCloskey（1992）提出算术事实之间的分离是由对每个操作特定的独立存储网络的选择性损坏导致的。我们将争辩说，我们的发现对于Dehaene的模型是有问题的，并且与McCloskey的观点非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号