首页> 外文期刊>Applied optics >Antireflection efficiency comparison of single- and double-layered structures for photovoltaic glass covers
【24h】

Antireflection efficiency comparison of single- and double-layered structures for photovoltaic glass covers

机译:光伏玻璃罩单层和双层结构的减反射效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For single-layer antireflection (AR) on glass, a low refractive index (n) AR layer is required to achieve high AR efficiency, which limits the selection of materials. The double-layered AR structure has a lower requirement on materials' n but is typically used for narrow waveband AR, and photovoltaic glass covers require broadband AR to increase the whole-spectrum solar energy transmittance. With the help of a multilayered optical simulation, we optimized the n and thickness of the single and double layered AR structure and found that, for broadband AR, double-layered structure only showed AR efficiency advantages in very high or low top layers' n compared to single AR layer structure. For a n = 1.45 top layer of the double layer structure, the optimized reflectance is 2.57% (single side), while the optimized reflectance of a single AR layer with n = 1.45 is 2.87%, which is a negligible AR efficiency advantage (0.30%) when considering production costs. Moreover, in our experiment, using SiO_2 and SiO_2 and TiO_2 composite layers, the absorption of short wavelengths by TiO_2 ostensibly cancelled this advantage out (92.87% compare to the single layer's 92.98% for single side AR).
机译:对于玻璃上的单层抗反射(AR),需要低折射率(n)的AR层才能实现高AR效率,这限制了材料的选择。双层增透膜结构对材料的n要求较低,但通常用于窄带增透膜,光伏玻璃罩需要宽带增透膜,以提高全光谱太阳能透射率。借助多层光学仿真,我们优化了单层和双层AR结构的n和厚度,发现对于宽带AR,双层结构仅在极高或低顶层n上显示出AR效率优势。到单个AR层结构。对于双层结构的1.45顶层,优化反射率为2.57%(单面),而n = 1.45的单个AR层的优化反射率为2.87%,这是可以忽略的AR效率优势(0.30% )在考虑生产成本时。此外,在我们的实验中,使用SiO_2和SiO_2和TiO_2复合层,TiO_2吸收短波长表面上抵消了这一优势(92.87%,而单面AR的单层为92.98%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号