...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Zootaxa >A study of the type series of Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda, Nautilida)
【24h】

A study of the type series of Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda, Nautilida)

机译：鹦鹉螺（Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus）类型系列的研究，1758年（软体动物，头足纲，鹦鹉螺）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Few animals are treasured by zoologists more than Nautilus, and Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus, 1758, the type species of the genus, in particular. However, the type series of this species has not been studied in great detail. According to the rules of zoological nomenclature the type series consists of all the specimens included by the author in the new nominal taxon at the time of description (whether directly or by bibliographic reference), and any evidence, published or unpublished, may be taken into account to determine what specimens are included. The type series of Nautilus pompilius includes specimens in the Linnean Society of London, the University Museum in Uppsala, and specimens figured by pre-Linnaean authors indicated by reference by Linnaeus (1758). One specimen in London and four specimens in Uppsala, which are still extant, are likely to have been known to Linnaeus at the time when he prepared the 10th Edition of Systema Naturae (Linnaeus 1758), although none of these specimens was specifically mentioned by him. Even though it is widely believed that Linnaeus (1767) designated as lectotype a specimen figured by Rumphius (1705) in his D'Amboinsche Rariteitkamer, referred to in the Systema Naturae, this presumed lectotypification is not valid because Linnaeus did not explicitly indicate that any particular specimen was considered to be the type of the species. Later lectotype designations of Rumphius' illustrations are invalid because they show three different specimens. It seems that the best approach, given the quality of the material and the lack of clarity as to its type status, would be to apply to the ICZN asking to set aside all previous type fixations and designate a neotype, preferably a DNA sequenced specimen of known provenance.
机译：动物学家最珍惜的动物莫过于鹦鹉螺（Nautilus），尤其是鹦鹉螺鹦鹉螺（Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus，1758）。但是，尚未对该物种的类型系列进行详细研究。根据动物命名规则，类型系列由作者在描述时包含在新名义分类中的所有标本组成（无论是直接标本还是通过书目参考），并且任何已发表或未发表的证据都可以纳入其中。确定包含哪些标本。 po鱼的类型系列包括伦敦林奈学会的标本，乌普萨拉大学博物馆的标本，以及林奈以前的作者所标出的标本，并由林奈（1758）指出。 Linnaeus在编写第10版Systema Naturae（Linnaeus 1758）时可能已经知道伦敦的一个标本和Uppsala的四个标本，这些标本目前仍在使用，尽管他没有特别提到这些标本。 。尽管人们普遍认为Linnaeus（1767）被指定为选型，是Rumphius（1705）在他的《 D'Amboinsche Rariteitkamer》（在《系统自然》中提到）所标明的标本，但这种假定的选型无效，因为Linnaeus没有明确指出特定的标本被认为是物种的类型。 Rumphius插图的后来的选型指定无效，因为它们显示了三个不同的标本。鉴于材料的质量以及类型状态的不清楚，最好的方法似乎是应用于ICZN，要求搁置所有以前的类型固定，并指定新的类型，最好是DNA序列标本。已知出处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号