...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown
【24h】

A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown

机译:在微创食管切除术后Peri操作并发症的标准化比较:IVOR Lewis与McKeown

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While our institutional approach to esophageal resection for cancer has traditionally favored a minimally invasive (MI) 3-hole, McKeown esophagectomy (MIE 3-hole) during the last five years several factors has determined a shift in our practice with an increasing number of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (MIE IL) resections being performed. We compared peri-operative outcomes of the two procedures, hypothesizing that MIE IL would be less morbid in the peri-operative setting compared to MIE 3-hole.
机译:虽然我们对癌症食管切除的制度方法传统上,但在过去五年中,麦克敦食管切除术(MIE 3孔)的最小侵入性(MI)3洞,几个因素已经确定了我们的实践中的越来越多 正在进行侵入性象藤刘易斯(MIE IL)切除。 我们比较了两种程序的Peri操作结果,假设与MIE 3孔相比,米尔IL在PERI操作环境中不会变得较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号