...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Nannofossil assemblage in Kutch
【24h】

Nannofossil assemblage in Kutch

机译：库奇的Nannofossil组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Jyotsana Rai's1 report on the occurrence of nannofossils of Albian age from a plant bed of the Bhuj Formation is interesting and significant. It is an accidental but important discovery. She has rightly stressed its importance on the age and environment of deposition of the Bhuj Formation. However, conclusions drawn by her on these two aspects raise controversies and need to be discussed. I had reviewed this paper. Considering the limitations of the study, I suggested modifications in order to avoidcontradictions with the existing field data and proven facts. However, it appears that my comments and suggestions were not taken into account while revising the manuscript. For the benefit of the researchers I feel it is necessary to explain here the anomalies created by rash conclusions drawn on limited data.Two important conclusions drawn are: (i) The nannofossil assemblage indicates early Middle Albian age of the Bhuj Formation (referred as Bhuj 'Member' in the text by Rai); (ii) The presence of nannofossils confirms the marine environment of the Bhuj Formation supporting 'an uninterrupted marine succession from at least Late Bajocian to early Middle Albian in Kutch basin'.
机译：Jyotsana Rai [1]报道了从布杰组的植物床中出现的阿尔比时代的纳米化石是有趣而有意义的。这是一个偶然但重要的发现。她正确地强调了其对普杰组沉积时代和沉积环境的重要性。但是，她关于这两个方面的结论引起了争议，需要加以讨论。我已经审阅了这篇论文。考虑到研究的局限性，我建议进行修改，以避免与现有的现场数据和已证明的事实相矛盾。但是，在修改稿件时似乎没有考虑到我的意见和建议。为了研究人员的利益，我认为有必要在此解释由有限数据得出的轻率结论所造成的异常现象。得出的两个重要结论是：（i）纳米化石组合表明了布吉组的早期中阿尔比时代（简称布吉） Rai案文中的“成员”）; （ii）纳米化石的存在证实了布杰组的海洋环境支持着“从库奇盆地至少在巴约西亚晚期到中阿尔比早期的不间断的海洋演替”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号