首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Yardstick for participation in scientific research: Intellectual capacity or mere technical competence?
【24h】

Yardstick for participation in scientific research: Intellectual capacity or mere technical competence?

机译:参与科学研究的标尺:智力能力还是仅是技术能力?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nowadays, many researchers are burdening their memory with protocols than concepts. They mistake the ability to memorize protocols as the ability to think productively. The most striking aspects of the work of Gregor Mendel, James Watson and Kary Mullis- 'foundations of genetics', 'double helical structure of DNA' and 'polymerase chain reaction (PCR)' respectively, are (a) their interdisciplinary approach for arriving at their concepts and (b) their intellectual capacity to visualize something based on the available data at that time in different domains of science. We hail them as path-breakers. However, lessons are not learnt from their works. Many confuse technical competence with intellectual capacity. If a plant gene can be localized with the help of an aneuploid series, then there is no need for in situ hybridization to do the same cytogenetic work. The latter can be either used as a precision tool or wherever there is limited scope for the former. Many researchers are not formulating projects based on the need, but based on the availability of instruments. Doing some work just because instruments are available, is ridiculous.
机译:如今,许多研究人员正在用协议而不是概念来负担他们的记忆。他们将记忆协议的能力误认为是进行有效思考的能力。 Gregor Mendel,James Watson和Kary Mullis的工作中最引人注目的方面分别是“遗传学的基础”,“ DNA的双螺旋结构”和“聚合酶链反应(PCR)”,(a)他们的跨学科研究方法(b)基于当时在不同科学领域中可用的数据可视化某些东西的智力能力。我们称赞他们为开拓者。但是,没有从他们的作品中学到教训。许多人将技术能力与知识能力混为一谈。如果植物基因可以借助非整倍体系列进行定位,则无需原位杂交即可完成相同的细胞遗传学工作。后者可以用作精密工具,也可以用作前者的有限范围。许多研究人员不是根据需求制定项目,而是根据工具的可用性来制定项目。仅仅因为有仪器就做一些工作是荒谬的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号