• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current Surgery >Does academic intervention impact ABS qualifying examination results?
【24h】

Does academic intervention impact ABS qualifying examination results?

机译：学术干预会影响ABS合格考试结果吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a focused academic support program on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and Qualifying Examination (QE) outcomes. METHODS: A mandatory intervention program was begun in April 2001 for residents with ABSITE Total Test (TT) percentiles <31. Program elements included: 1) individual faculty mentoring and personal learning plan 2) QE videotape review sessions 3) Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program (SESAP) 4) monthly rotation evaluations, and 5) quarterly status feedback. A free medical evaluation was offered. Mock orals participation, educational psychologist consultation, and voluntary followup mentoring were added later. Study data were reviewed for 2003-2005 Chief Residents including ABSITE scores, QE results, conference attendance, rotation Overall Performance ratings, and resident surgeon case volumes. Results were compared for the academic intervention (AI) and no intervention (NI) groups. RESULTS: Fifteen residents graduated during the study period. Eight residents completed nine interventions; seven returned to TT percentiles >30 (7/8, 88%). First post-intervention ABSITE gains were large compared to NI and national peer groups. Standard Score (SS) TT gains were maintained until residency completion by four AI residents. Median AI PGY-5 TT percentile was 32 and three scores were
机译：目的：评估一项重点学术支持计划对美国外科外科进修考试（ABSITE）分数和合格考试（QE）结果的影响。方法：2001年4月开始针对ABSITE总测试（TT）百分位数<31的居民实施强制干预计划。计划内容包括：1）个人教师指导和个人学习计划2）QE录像带审查会议3）外科教育和自我评估计划（SESAP）4）每月轮岗评估，以及5）季度状态反馈。提供免费的医学评估。后来增加了模拟口语的参与，教育心理学家的咨询以及自愿的后续指导。审查了2003-2005年主要居民的研究数据，包括ABSITE分数，QE结果，会议出席率，轮换总体表现等级以及住院医师的病例数量。比较了学术干预（AI）和无干预（NI）组的结果。结果：在研究期间有15名居民毕业。八名居民完成了九项干预措施;七个返回TT百分位数> 30（7/8，88％）。与NI和全国同龄人群相比，干预后的首个ABSITE收益大。维持标准分数（SS）TT收益，直到由四名AI居民完成居住。 AI PGY-5 TT的中位数为32，三个分数为<或= 25。六个AI居民（6/8，75％）和所有NI居民（7/7，100％）首次通过了QE。 AI和NI组在会议出席，轮换评估和手术记录总数方面相似。结论：针对边缘性ABSITE TT百分位数的居民进行有针对性的学术支持干预可以立即产生实质性收益。在剩余的居住年限内，收益会保持不变。在三个AI居民（3/8，38％）中看到的PGY-5 TT百分位数<或= 25，与40％的首次QE失败率相关。因此，我们针对AI居民的75％的QE首次通过率证明干预成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号