...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AACE International Transactions >Staying Out of Legal Trouble through Effective Schedule Practice
【24h】

Staying Out of Legal Trouble through Effective Schedule Practice

机译：通过有效的时间表练习避免法律麻烦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The schedule is an important tool for forecasting and analysing the temporal aspect of a project. Where a project is delivered in part by various subcontractors, multiple schedules abound with the likelihood that they are not integrated into a master schedule. Is it necessary for the principal to ensure that individual schedules are integrated, with all interdependencies identified via the use of schedule logic, and shared with its subcontractors? Is there a good faith requirement to do so? What does good faith really mean? This article addresses these key questions through an Australian case study where a project incurred delay. The principal claimed inter alia delay damages from the sub-contractor, who subsequently cross-claimed that their performance of the contract (and the project) was hindered by the failure of the principal to act in good faith. The matter could have been avoided through effective scheduling practice.
机译：进度表是预测和分析项目的时间方面的重要工具。如果某个项目是由各个分包商部分交付的，则存在多个时间表，因此它们可能没有集成到主时间表中。委托人是否有必要确保将单个时间表集成在一起，并通过使用时间表逻辑来识别所有相互依存关系，并与分包商共享？是否有诚信要求？真诚到底意味着什么？本文通过一个澳大利亚案例研究解决了这些关键问题，其中一个项目导致了延误。委托人除其他外要求分包商赔偿延误损害赔偿金，分包商随后反驳称，由于委托人不善意行事，阻碍了他们履行合同（和项目）。通过有效的调度实践可以避免此事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号