...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Commentary: the ACGME: public advocacy before resident advocacy.
【24h】

Commentary: the ACGME: public advocacy before resident advocacy.

机译:评论:ACGME:居民倡导之前的公众倡导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In their insightful and provocative analysis in this issue, Drs. Lypson, Hamstra, and Colletti propose that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), with some modifications in process, might assume the role of unions or other collective bargaining units for residents. They make valid observations about aspects of the ACGME Institutional Requirements that pertain to resident safety and well-being and the environment in which residents learn and participate in care. To understand the nature of these requirements, the authors reiterate the ACGME's role as an educational accreditor and the philosophical basis for its accreditation function. The authors conclude that the ACGME cannot and will not replace resident unions, associations, or other groups where residents perceive the need arising for the presence of these organizations.
机译:在他们对这一问题的见解和挑衅性分析中,Dr。 Lypson,Hamstra和Colletti建议,对研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)进行一些修改后,可以扮演工会或其他居民集体谈判单位的角色。他们对ACGME机构要求的有关居民安全和福祉以及居民学习和参与护理的环境的方面提出了有效的意见。为了理解这些要求的性质,作者重申了ACGME作为教育认可者的作用以及其认可功能的哲学基础。作者得出的结论是,ACGME不能也不会取代居民联盟,协会或其他居民认为居民需要这些组织存在的团体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号