...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Three dimensional assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with high resolution MR-arthrography and MSCT-arthrography.
【24h】

Three dimensional assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with high resolution MR-arthrography and MSCT-arthrography.

机译:高分辨率MR造影和MSCT造影对尸体中膝关节软骨的三维评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography and multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) arthrography in the evaluation of the entire knee cartilage obtained from cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR arthrography and MSCT arthrography were performed on 16 cadaver knees, and their findings were compared to those found during macroscopic assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography and MSCT arthrography for detecting cartilage lesions of grade > or = 2 and Spearman's correlation coefficients between arthrographic and macroscopic grades were determined. In addition, cartilage surface conspicuity of the two techniques was measured using a subjective ranking system. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for the detection of cartilage disorder (grade > or = 2) were 87% and 97% on MR arthrography and 84% and 99% on MSCT arthrography. There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques in sensitivity (P = 1.000) or specificity (P = .625). Spearman's correlation coefficients between MR arthrography or MSCT arthrography and macroscopic grading were 0.783 and 0.800, respectively, with no statistically difference (P = .492). Both MR arthrography and MSCT arthrography enabled the accurate depiction of cartilage surface. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution MR arthrography and MSCT arthrography were comparably accurate for the assessment of cartilage lesions of the entire knee.
机译:理由和目的:这项研究的目的是比较高分辨率磁共振(MR)造影术和多层计算机断层摄影(MSCT)造影术,以评估从尸体获得的整个膝关节软骨。材料与方法:对16具尸体膝盖进行MR关节造影和MSCT关节造影,并将其发现与宏观评估中发现的进行比较。确定了MR关节造影和MSCT关节造影对检测≥2或= 2的软骨损伤的敏感性和特异性,并确定了关节造影和宏观等级之间的Spearman相关系数。另外,使用主观分级系统测量了两种技术的软骨表面显着性。结果:MR关节造影对软骨疾病(≥2级)的敏感性和特异性分别为87%和97%,而MSCT造影术为84%和99%。两种技术在敏感性(P = 1.000)或特异性(P = .625)上没有统计学上的显着差异。 MR关节造影或MSCT关节造影与宏观分级之间的Spearman相关系数分别为0.783和0.800,无统计学差异(P = .492)。 MR关节造影和MSCT关节造影均可准确描绘软骨表面。结论:高分辨率MR关节造影和MSCT关节造影在评估整个膝关节软骨病变方面具有相当的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号