...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Preferences for Structured Reporting of Measurement Data. An Institutional Survey of Medical Oncologists, Oncology Registrars, and Radiologists
【24h】

Preferences for Structured Reporting of Measurement Data. An Institutional Survey of Medical Oncologists, Oncology Registrars, and Radiologists

机译：测量数据的结构化报告的首选项。医学肿瘤学家，肿瘤注册员和放射科医生的机构调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether key radiology report "consumers" in our institution prefer structured measurement reporting in a dedicated report section over the current practice of embedding measurements throughout the "Findings" section, given the availability of new tools for quantitative imaging interpretation that enable automated structured reporting of measurement data. Materials and Methods: Oncologic clinicians and radiologists at our institution were surveyed regarding their preferences for a standard report versus three reports each having uniquely formatted dedicated "Measurements" sections and regarding their impressions of various characteristics of report quality demonstrated by these reports. The online survey was completed by 25 radiologists, 16 oncologists, and 17 oncology nurses and research assistants (registrars). Results: Aggregation of respondents' preferences by group into single orderings using the Kemeny-Young method revealed that both oncology groups preferred all proposed reports to the standard report but that radiologists only preferred two of the proposed reports to the standard report. All preferences for proposed reports in the two oncology groups were statistically significant based on Wilcoxon tests, but the preference for only one of the proposed reports was significant for radiologists. Additional results suggest that these preferences are driven by respondent favor for the readability of and confidence conveyed by the proposed reports compared to the standard report. Conclusions: Oncologic clinicians responding to our survey preferred communication of lesion measurements in a separate report section to the current practice of embedding measurements throughout the "Findings" section, based on their assessments of reports containing simulated measurement sections assembled from a single sample report using standardized formatting.
机译：原理和目的：本研究旨在确定，鉴于新的可用性，我们机构中的主要放射学报告“消费者”相对于将测量结果嵌入整个“发现”部分的当前做法，是否更愿意在专用报告部分中使用结构化测量报告。用于定量成像解释的工具，可实现对测量数据的自动结构化报告。资料和方法：对我们机构的肿瘤临床医生和放射科医生进行了调查，以了解他们偏爱标准报告，而不是三个报告，每个报告都有独特格式的专用“度量”部分，以及他们对这些报告所展示的报告质量的各种特征的印象。在线调查由25位放射科医生，16位肿瘤科医生，17位肿瘤学护士和研究助理（注册员）完成。结果：使用Kemeny-Young方法将受访者的偏好按组汇总为单个顺序显示，两个肿瘤学组均将所有建议的报告优先于标准报告，但放射科医生仅希望将建议的报告中的两个推荐给标准报告。根据Wilcoxon测试，两组肿瘤科对拟议报告的所有偏好均具有统计学显着性，但对于放射科医生而言，仅对拟议报告中的一项偏好具有显着意义。其他结果表明，这些偏好是由受访者对拟议报告与标准报告相比的可读性和置信度的偏爱所推动的。结论：回应我们调查的肿瘤临床医生倾向于在单独的报告部分中进行病变测量的信息交流，而不是根据在“发现”部分中嵌入测量的当前做法，这是基于他们对包含模拟测量部分的报告的评估，这些评估是使用标准化方法从单个样本报告中汇总而来的。格式化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号