...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academic psychiatry: the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry >Patient satisfaction questionnaires in trainee evaluations
【24h】

Patient satisfaction questionnaires in trainee evaluations

机译：学员评估中的患者满意度问卷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Setting up appropriate assessments for postgraduate trainees in psychiatry is difficult. Members of the public, i.e. possible future patients, need to be sure that somebody who is recognized as a psychiatrist is able to function as such. However, it is less clear how one should assess this. Brittlebank et al. [1] added to this discussion by describing a study of different types of workplace-based assessments, for example a mini-assessed clinical encounter, whereby a supervisor observes the trainee performing a specific task such as assessing suicide risk and gives feedback afterwards. They found correlations between most measures, for example the correlation between case-based discussion and mini-assessed clinical encounter was 0.61 (p< 0.001). However, the patient satisfaction questionnaire results seemed to be different and did not correlate with other measures.
机译：为精神病学研究生进行适当的评估很困难。公众，即可能的未来患者，需要确保公认的精神病医生能够这样做。但是，尚不清楚应该如何评估这一点。 Brittlebank等。 [1]通过描述对不同类型的基于工作场所的评估（例如小型评估的临床遭遇）的研究来增加讨论的内容，其中主管可以观察受训者执行特定任务（例如评估自杀风险）并随后提供反馈。他们发现大多数衡量指标之间的相关性，例如，基于案例的讨论与小型评估的临床遭遇之间的相关性为0.61（p <0.001）。但是，患者满意度调查表的结果似乎有所不同，并且与其他指标无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号