...
【24h】

Using standardized patients' marks in scoring postgraduate psychiatry OSCEs.

机译:使用标准化的患者评分为研究生精神病学OSCE评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Standardized patients (SPs) do not contribute scores in postgraduate psychiatry objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) in the United Kingdom. However, this may change in the near future. The primary aim of this study was to measure the degree of agreement between scores given by examiners and those given by SPs in an OSCE. METHODS: The authors measured the degree of agreement in two consecutive postgraduate OSCEs for psychiatric residents on a London training scheme. RESULTS: Fifty-five candidates participated in the two OSCEs. There was a moderate degree of agreement between examiner and SP scores for communication and for the overall mark. However, there was a stronger relationship between the examiner score for communication and the candidates' overall mark. CONCLUSION: Examiners and SPs scored candidates differently. Therefore, the decision to include SP scores in the marking scheme for postgraduate OSCEs would be a significant development.
机译:目的:标准化患者(SP)在英国的研究生精神病学客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)中没有贡献分数。但是,这可能会在不久的将来改变。这项研究的主要目的是衡量审查员给出的分数与OSCE中SP给出的分数之间的一致性程度。方法:作者在伦敦培训计划中对精神病患者在连续两个研究生OSCE中的一致性程度进行了测量。结果:55名候选人参加了两次欧安组织。在沟通和整体评分上,考官与SP评分之间存在中等程度的一致性。但是,考官的交流分数与考生的总体评分之间存在更强的关系。结论:考官和SP对考生的评分不同。因此,决定将SP分数纳入OSCE研究生评分方案将是一个重大进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号