Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019)

首页> 外文期刊>Biology & philosophy >Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019)

【24h】

Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019)

机译：利用稳定性，特异性和比例的问题作为评估科学因果解释的强度的标准：Lynch等人评论。（2019）

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Lynch et al. (Biol Philos 34:62, 2019) employ stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating microbiome causal explanations. Although these causal characteristics signify relevant differences between causal roles, I suggest that they should not be used as general criteria for strong or good causal explanations.

机译：Lynch等人。（BIOL Philos 34:62,2019）采用稳定性，特异性和比例作为评估微生物组因果解释的标准。虽然这些因果特征意味着因果角色之间的相关差异，但我建议他们不应被用作强大或良好因果解释的一般标准。

著录项

来源
《Biology & philosophy》 |2020年第1期|共5页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类生物科学;
关键词
Causal explanation; Causal strength; Microbiome; Proportionality; Specificity; Stability;

机译：因果解释;因果强度;微生物组;比例;特异性;稳定性;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019) [J] . Biology & philosophy . 2020,第1期

机译：利用稳定性，特异性和比例的问题作为评估科学因果解释的强度的标准：Lynch等人评论。（2019）
2. Commentary on Pilarinos et al. (2019): Scientific realism and the study of coerced substance use treatment [J] . Urbanoski Karen A. Addiction . 2020,第1期

机译：Pilarinos等人的评论。（2019年）：科学现实主义与胁迫物质处理研究
3. Commentary on “Strengths and Weaknesses in the Intellectual Profile of Different Subtypes of Specific Learning Disorder” (Toffalini et al., 2017) [J] . A. Alexander Beaujean Clinical Psychological Science . 2017,第5期

机译：关于“特定学习障碍不同亚型的智力与弱点的”优势和弱点“评论”（Toffalini等，2017）
4. Interactive Causal Schematics for Qualitative Scientific Explanations [C] . Robert B. Allen, Yejun Wu, Jun Luo International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries . 2005

机译：定性科学解释的互动因果原理图
5. EXPERT AND NOVICE PERFORMANCE IN BIOCHEMISTRY PROBLEM-SOLVING AND EXPLANATION (CAUSAL, STRATEGIES, SCIENTIFIC, DECOMPOSITION) [D] . PLOGER, DONALD HOWARD. 1986

机译：生物化学问题解决和解释的专家和新手表现（因果，策略，科学，分解）
6. Invited Commentary: The Causal Association Between Obesity and Stillbirth—Strengths and Limitations of the Consecutive-Pregnancies Approach [O] . Jonathan M Snowden, Stephanie A Leonard -1

机译：特邀评论：肥胖与死产之间的因果关系-连续妊娠方法的优势和局限性
7. Commentary on Degenhardt et al.(2013): Specific effect of adolescent cannabis use on axienty - tentative explanations [O] . Huizink A.C. 2013

机译：对Degenhardt等人的评论（2013）：青少年使用大麻对焦虑的特殊影响-初步解释

Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019)

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅