• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of educational psychology >Incorporating perspective analysis into critical thinking performance assessments
【24h】

Incorporating perspective analysis into critical thinking performance assessments

机译：将透视分析纳入关键思维绩效评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background The International Performance Assessments of Learning (iPAL) project developed a framework for the construction of performance assessments for testing critical thinking, which proposes structuring them around a problem situation that sets an authentic (i.e., real-life-like) problem-solving task for the test-taker. Its critical thinking construct - which reflects the dominant conception of critical thinking - focuses on assessment and use of information, of arguments, and of consequences, and on communication. However, it fails to acknowledge that perspectives on a problem situation are systemically articulated in networks and derive from worldviews, which should also be critically examined. Aims We aim to elaborate on the iPAL framework and enhance its critical thinking construct, incorporating a new facet of perspective analysis. We also intend to show what design considerations the construction of a performance assessment appropriate for this task entails. Development Based on Werner Ulrich's Critical Systems Heuristics, which provides a systemic way of analysing perspectives about a problem situation, we argue the need to introduce perspective analysis in the critical thinking construct, and we discuss the considerations necessary for designing critical thinking performance assessments that test perspective analysis skills: about the kind of problem situation the test-taker will face and about the expectations she may have about her task or role in that problem situation. We illustrate how performance assessments of this kind can be constructed by means of an example of an actual test.
机译：背景技术学习国际绩效评估（IPAL）项目制定了一个履行绩效评估的框架，以测试批判性思维，这建议将它们构建它们，这些问题局势，这些问题设置了真实（即现实生活）解决问题的解决问题对于测试接受者。其批判性思维构建 - 反映了批判性思路的主导概念 - 专注于评估和使用信息，论点以及后果以及沟通。但是，它未能承认问题情况的观点在网络中系统地阐述并从世界观中得出，这也应该受到严密检查的。旨在旨在详细说明IPAL框架并增强其批判性思维构建，纳入了透视分析的新方面。我们还打算展示什么设计考虑因素，建造适合此任务的绩效评估需要。基于Werner Ulrich的关键系统启发式的开发，提供了一种系统的分析方式，分析了关于问题情况的观点，我们认为需要在批判性思维构造中引入透视分析，并讨论设计考试的关键思维绩效评估所需的考虑因素透视分析技能：关于这种问题情况的情况，考试者将面临，并且关于她可能对她的任务或在这种问题情况下的角色的期望。我们说明了如何通过实际测试的示例来构建这种类型的性能评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号