...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of earthquake engineering >A review of experimental and analytical studies on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames
【24h】

A review of experimental and analytical studies on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames

机译：砌体夹具框架外平面行为的实验和分析研究综述

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper presents a literature review of research undertaken on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames. This paper also discusses the effects of bidirectional loads, openings, slenderness, boundary conditions etc. As numerous researchers have reported, these effects play a crucial role in achieving arching action cause, as they can bypass or limit its effectiveness. Namely, arching action leads to additional compressive forces which resist traversal ones. This is confirmed by inertial force methods of testing, while the same cannot be claimed for inter-storey drift or dynamical methods. It is to be acknowledged that most experimental tests were carried out using inertial force methods, mostly with the use of airbags. In contrast, only a few were undertaken with dynamical methods and just two with inter-storey drift methods. It was found that inertial force and inter-storey drift methods differ widely. In particular, inertial force methods damage the infill, leaving the frame more or less intact. Conversely, drift heavily damages the frame, while infill only slightly. Openings were investigated, albeit with contrasting results. Namely, in all cases, it was found that openings do lower the deformational but not all load-bearing capacities. Furthermore, analytical models have shown contrasting results between themselves and with experimental data. Models' stabilities were checked with single- and multi-variable parametric analysis from which governing factors, influences of frame and other parameters were identified.
机译：本文提出了对砌体夹具框架外平面行为的研究的文献综述。本文还讨论了双向载荷，开口，细长，边界条件等的影响。随着众多研究人员所述，这些效果在实现拱形行动方面发挥着至关重要的作用，因为它们可以绕过或限制其有效性。即，拱形动作导致抵抗遍历的压缩力。这是通过惯性力的测试方法来证实，而不能要求跨越跨越漂移或动态方法。应承认，大多数实验测试使用惯性力方法进行，主要是使用安全气囊。相比之下，只有少数几个动态方法，只有两个跨越跨越漂移方法。发现惯性力和层间漂移方法广泛不同。特别是，惯性力方法损坏填充物，留下框架或多或少完整。相反，漂移严重损坏框架，而仅略微填略。调查了开口，尽管呈对比结果。即，在所有情况下，发现开口确实降低了变形但不是所有承载能力。此外，分析模型已经显示出与实验数据之间的对比结果。使用单次和多变量参数分析检查模型的稳定性，从哪些控制因素，帧的影响和其他参数的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号