• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Acta horticulturae et regiotecturae >INFLUENCE OF ECOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF FARMING ON BIODIVERSITY OF BASIC EPIGEIC GROUP
【24h】

INFLUENCE OF ECOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF FARMING ON BIODIVERSITY OF BASIC EPIGEIC GROUP

机译：农业生态综合管理对基本经验群体生物多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the influence of the different types of farming on the occurrence of basic epigeic groups. The experiment was located on the locality of Experimental bases of SUA in Nitra. The results of collectionsof biological material obtained in the year 2012 during the growing season (April to October) and within the framework of the integrated and ecological type of farming were evaluated. There we used collection method by ground traps, which have been exposed within three crops: Medicago sativa, Triticum aestivum and Pisum sativum. The obtained epigeic groups were evaluated: dominance, identity of communities by Jaccard, degree of diversity and homeostasis of agro-ecosystems. There were obtained 7,934 ex of epigeic animals'components from which in the integrated type of farming there were 3,416 ex, and 4,518 ex in favour of organic type of farming. The obtained individuals were in 18 epigeic groups out of which in the integrated type 15 epigeic groups andin the organic type 18 epigeic groups were determinated. There were 15 epigeic groups identical for both types of farming. The frequency in crops in integrated type of farming was as follows: Medicago sativa 922 ex, Triticum aestivum 1333 ex and Pisum sativum 1161 ex, and in the ecological type of farming as follows: Medicago sativa 1131 ex, Triticum aestivum 1722 ex and Pisum sativum 1165 ex. As dominant occurring epigeic groups, there were Coleoptera, Acarina and Collembola.The presence of other epigeic groups recorded lower representation at the level of recedental or subrecedental representation; they were e.g. Formicoidea, Chilopoda, Isopoda, Diplopoda, Dermaptera, etc.. We also calculated similarity value of communities within the compared typesof farming; it has reached the value of 83.33%. The value of diversity in the context of the integrated system of farming was 0.6744 and in the context of the organic system of farming was 0.7172. Specified calculated values in terms of impact of conditions and homeostasis of environment confirmed ecological farming as a better suited option because the present zoofauna reacts sensitively e.g. on the used insecticides and also the realized cultivation of the soil.
机译：这项实验研究的目的是评估不同农业类型对基本流行群体的发生的影响。该实验位于Nitra SUA实验基地的所在地。评估了在生长季节（4月至10月）于2012年在一体化和生态农业类型的框架内获得的生物材料的收集结果。在这里，我们使用了通过地下陷阱收集的方法，这些陷阱已暴露于三种作物：紫花苜蓿，普通小麦和豌豆。对获得的流行群体进行了评估：优势地位，Jaccard提出的社区认同，农业生态系统的多样性程度和稳态。获得了7,934 ex的野外动物成分，其中综合耕作类型中有3,416 ex，而有机耕作类型中有4,518 ex。所获得的个体属于18个流行群，其中确定了整合的15个流行群和有机的18个流行群。两种农业都有15个相同的流行群体。一体化耕作中农作物的发生频率如下：紫花苜蓿922 ex，普通小麦1333 ex和豌豆Pisum sativum 1161 ex，以及生态耕作的频率如下：紫花苜蓿1131 ex，普通小麦1722 ex和豌豆Pisum sativum 1165前作为主要的流行群体，有鞘翅目，A螨和Collembola。其他流行群体的存在在后向或后代的代表性水平上较低。他们是Formicoidea，Chilopoda，Isopoda，Diplopoda，Dermaptera等。我们还计算了比较类型的农业中各社区的相似度值。它已经达到了83.33％的值。在农业综合系统的背景下，多样性的价值为0.6744，在有机农业系统的背景下，多样性的价值为0.7172。根据条件和环境动态平衡的影响而指定的计算值证实了生态农业是一种更合适的选择，因为目前的动物群对例如动物的反应很敏感。对使用过的杀虫剂以及已实现的土壤耕作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号