【24h】

On the complexity of model complexity: Viewpoints across the geosciences

机译:论模型复杂性的复杂性:地球科学的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is the core task of geoscientists to gain insight into the complex systems of nature. Yet, complexity may be perceived very differently and a plethora of models with different degrees of complexity is available. How do we, geoscientists, decide what model complexity is warranted? Does this differ among disciplines? And, how do we even define model complexity? We developed a short questionnaire to investigate the geoscientific community's views on complexity in models. The response was overwhelming, with 618 completed responses. The results show that the number of processes explicitly included and the number of interactions / feedbacks incorporated were seen as important determinants of complexity. Confidence was not per se higher in the simulations of a complex model compared to a simple one. Interestingly, neither gender, the discipline within the geosciences, nor career stage or work sector, explained the characterization of model complexity. The results of the questionnaire demonstrate that there is no general consensus on how model complexity is perceived or should be defined, and that formal definitions are not broadly or generally accepted. In an environment seeking greater collaboration and interdisciplinarity, these results indicate the need for conscious dialogue about this topic among different model users.
机译:地球科学家的核心任务是深入了解复杂性质的洞察力。然而,可以非常不同地感知复杂性,并且可以获得具有不同复杂程度的多种模型。我们如何确定有权确定模型复杂性吗?这在学科之间是否有所不同?而且,我们如何定义模型复杂性?我们制定了一个简短的问卷调查,调查地球科学界对模型复杂性的看法。响应压倒了,618名完成了回应。结果表明,明确包括的过程数量和结合的相互作用/反馈的数量被视为复杂性的重要决定因素。与简单的模型相比,在复杂模型的模拟中,信心并不高。有趣的是,性别,地球科学内的纪律,也不是职业阶段或工作部门的性别,解释了模型复杂性的表征。调查问卷的结果表明,没有关于如何定义或应定义模型复杂性的一般性共识,并且不广泛或普遍接受正式定义。在寻求更大的协作和跨学科的环境中,这些结果表明需要在不同模型用户之间有意识地对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号