...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nursing research >Randomized Controlled Theory-Based, E-Mail-Mediated Walking Intervention: Differences Between Dog Owners and Non-Dog Owners
【24h】

Randomized Controlled Theory-Based, E-Mail-Mediated Walking Intervention: Differences Between Dog Owners and Non-Dog Owners

机译：随机控制理论为基础，电子邮件介导的步行干预：狗所有者和非狗业主之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two concurrent randomized controlled interventions based on social cognitive theory to increase walking. A second purpose was to compare the efficacy of the intervention between two distinct groups: dog owners and non-dog owners. Adult dog owners (n = 40) and non-dog owners (n = 65) were randomized into control or intervention groups. Intervention groups received bi-weekly emails for first 4 weeks and then weekly email for the next 8 weeks targeting self-efficacy, social support, goal setting, and benefits/barriers to walking. Dog owner messages focused on dog walking while non-dog owners received general walking messages. Control groups received a 1-time email reviewing current physical activity guidelines. At 6 months, both intervention groups reported greater increases in walking and maintained these increases at 12 months. The greatest increases were seen in the dog owner intervention group. In conclusion, dog owners accumulated more walking, which may be attributed to the dog-owner relationship.
机译：本研究的目的是评估基于社会认知理论的两种并发随机控制干预措施来增加行走的能力。第二个目的是比较两个不同群体之间干预的疗效：狗主人和非狗主人。成年狗主人（n = 40）和非狗业主（n = 65）被随机被随机进入控制或干预组。干预小组收到了前4周的每两周电子邮件，然后每周发送电子邮件，以获得自我效能，社会支持，目标设定和福利/行走的福利/障碍。狗所有者消息专注于狗散步，而非狗主人收到一般走路消息。对照组收到一封1次电子邮件审核当前的身体活动指南。 6个月，两种干预群报告在12个月内散步并维持这些增加。狗主干预组中最大的增加。总之，狗业主积累了更多的行走，这可能归因于狗主人关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号