...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition, Technology & Work >Evaluation research of the effects of diagrammatic guide signs with different complexities on driving behavior
【24h】

Evaluation research of the effects of diagrammatic guide signs with different complexities on driving behavior

机译：不同复杂性对驾驶行为不同复杂性的探明性指南迹象的评价研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many diagrammatic guide signs in China have become much more complex and more difficult to read than those in other countries. Furthermore, there are few regulations or studies regarding diagrammatic guide signs in China. A driving simulator experiment was conducted to analyze the influence of five typical diagrammatic guide signs with different complexities on driving behavior and to evaluate their comprehensive guidance effectiveness via the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The rANOVA results indicated that different diagrammatic guide signs have significantly different impacts on driving behavior. A higher complexity of the diagrammatic guide signs negatively impacted the subjective perception, operating status and maneuvering behavior. With increasing diagrammatic guide sign complexity, the gas pedal power significantly decreased at distances of 150-200 m and 50-100 m prior to the signs, the deceleration rapidly increased 150-200 m prior to the signs, the standard deviation of deceleration increased 100-150 m prior to the signs, the standard deviation of speed increased 50-100 m prior to the signs, and the speed decreased and driving time increased 0-50 m prior to the signs. Eight indicators were used to synthetically evaluate the comprehensive guidance effectiveness of the five types of diagrammatic guide signs. The final ranking (from best to worst) of the five diagrammatic guide signs with regard to their effectiveness was obtained. On the whole, a negative correlation relationship exists between the complexity and the comprehensive guidance effectiveness of the five types of diagrammatic guide signs. This relationship should be taken into account when designing new diagrammatic guide signs and optimizing complex diagrammatic guide signs in the future.
机译：在中国的许多图解指南迹象变得更加复杂，更难以阅读，而不是其他国家的迹象。此外，关于中国的图解指南标志，少数法规或研究。进行了驾驶模拟器实验，分析了五种典型视图标志对驾驶行为不同复杂性的影响，并通过对理想解决方案的相似性偏好的优先顺序评估它们的综合指导效果。 Ranova结果表明，不同的示意图标志对驾驶行为产生了显着不同的影响。较高的方法对图标志的标志对主观感知，操作状态和机动行为产生负面影响。随着图形指导符号复杂性的增加，在标志之前的距离150-200米和50-100米的距离下的气体踏板功率显着下降，在标志之前的减速速度迅速增加了150-200米，减速的标准偏差增加了100 -150米在标志之前，在标志之前的速度的标准偏差增加了50-100米，并且在标志之前的速度减小和驱动时间增加了0-50米。八种指标用于综合评价五种图形指南标志的综合指导效力。获得了关于其有效性的五个视图指导标志的最终排名（从最佳最差）。总的来说，存在的复杂性与五种图形指南标志的复杂性与综合指导效应之间存在负相关关系。在设计新的图解指南迹象和未来复杂视图指南迹象时，应考虑这种关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号