• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>CNS spectrums >Obsessive compulsive and related disorders: comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11
【24h】

Obsessive compulsive and related disorders: comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11

机译：强迫症和相关疾病：比较DSM-5和ICD-11

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been recognized as mainly characterized by compulsivity rather than anxiety and, therefore, was removed from the anxiety disorders chapter and given its own in both the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the Beta Draft Version of the 11th revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This revised clustering is based on increasing evidence of common affected neurocircuits between disorders, differently from previous classification systems based on interrater agreement. In this article, we focus on the classification of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs), examining the differences in approach adopted by these 2 nosological systems, with particular attention to the proposed changes in the forthcoming ICD-11. At this stage, notable differences in the ICD classification are emerging from the previous revision, apparently converging toward a reformulation of OCRDs that is closer to the DSM-5.
机译：强迫症（OCD）被认为是主要表征的强制性，而不是焦虑，因此，从焦虑症章节中除去并在美国精神病学协会（APA）诊断和精神统计手册中DSM-5）和世界卫生组织第11次修订版（世卫组织）疾病的国际分类（ICD-11）的β草案版本。这种修订的聚类是基于疾病之间共同受影响的神经电池的越来越多的群体，不同于基于Interrater协议的先前分类系统。在本文中，我们专注于强迫症和相关疾病的分类（OCRDS），检查这2个姿态系统采用的方法的差异，特别注意即将举行的ICD-11的提议变更。在此阶段，ICD分类中的显着差异是从之前的修订中出现的，显然会聚朝着更接近DSM-5的OCRDS的重新趋同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号