...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice >Comparing problem-focused, solution-focused and combined problem-focused/solution-focused coaching approach: solution-focused coaching questions mitigate the negative impact of dysfunctional attitudes
【24h】

Comparing problem-focused, solution-focused and combined problem-focused/solution-focused coaching approach: solution-focused coaching questions mitigate the negative impact of dysfunctional attitudes

机译：比较问题焦点，焦点和结合的问题集中/解决方案的教练方法：以解决方案为中心的教练问题减轻了功能失调态度的负面影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Little is known about impact of different types of questions used in coaching. This study compares the relative impact of 1) SF with 2) PF coaching questions and with 3) a combined problem-focused and solution-focused (PF + SF) coaching questions condition. Despite much discussion about the impact of mental health issues in coaching, there has been little research on how coachees' dysfunctional attitudes effect coaching outcomes. 80 participants were randomly assigned to PF, SF or PF + SF coaching conditions. It should be noted that a whole coaching session was not conducted - in an experimental self-coaching exercise participants responded to different types of coaching question: SF questions were more effective than PF questions on all measures. SF questions were also more effective at increasing self-efficacy and decreasing negative affect compared to a combined PF + SF approach. Dysfunctional attitudes were found to have a detrimental impact on negative affect following both PF and PF/ SF questions but not SF. Further analysis revealed that PF questions were significantly less effective on decreasing negative affect for participants 'high' in dysfunctional attitudes, but not for those 'low' in dysfunctional attitudes. For those 'low' in dysfunctional attitudes all three coaching styles were equally effective in reducing negative affect. No other significant relationships were observed between dysfunctional attitudes on goal attainment measures. This research suggests that SF approaches are more effective than PF or combined PF + SF. Recommendations for future research and potential implications for coaching practice are discussed.
机译：关于教练中使用的不同类型的问题的影响很少。本研究比较了1）SF与2）PF引导问题的相对影响，并用3）聚合的综合解决方案和解决方案（PF + SF）教练问题条件。尽管有很多关于精神卫生问题在教练的影响的讨论，但就教授的功能失调态度效应教练结果几乎没有研究。 80名参与者被随机分配给PF，SF或PF + SF指导条件。应该指出的是，没有进行整个教练会议 - 在一个实验自我教练的运动员中，参与者回应不同类型的教练问题：SF问题比所有措施的PF问题更有效。与组合的PF + SF方法相比，SF问题在增加自我效能和减少负面影响时也更有效。发现功能失调的态度对PF和PF / SF问题遵循的负面影响有害影响，但不是SF。进一步的分析表明，PF问题对减少对功能态度的对参与者的负面影响有效，但不适合这种功能失调态度的“低”。对于这种功能失调的态度态度，所有三种辅导风格都同样有效地减少负面影响。在目标达到措施的功能失调态度之间没有观察到其他显着的关系。该研究表明，SF方法比PF或组合PF + SF更有效。讨论了未来研究的建议和对教练实践的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号