• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral sciences & the law >Procedural injustice, police legitimacy, and officer gender: A vignette-based test of the invariance thesis
【24h】

Procedural injustice, police legitimacy, and officer gender: A vignette-based test of the invariance thesis

机译：程序不公正，警察合法性和官员性别：基于小插图的不变论文的测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Role congruity theory suggests that gender-based stereotypes can result in female police officers paying a higher price (i.e., viewed as less legitimate) relative to male officers for mistreating people. The invariance thesis posits that the effect of (un)fair treatment by legal authorities on legal attitudes and beliefs is stable across situations, time, and space. This study tested the invariance thesis by assessing whether the effect of procedural injustice on police legitimacy differed across officer gender. A factorial vignette survey that consisted of two types of citizen-initiated police encounters was administered to a university-based sample (N = 525). The results showed that the effect of procedural injustice had a powerful and significant influence on participants' legitimacy perceptions. These effects were consistent regardless of whether the treatment was doled out by a male or a female police officer. The findings provide support for the invariance thesis.
机译：角色传统理论表明，基于性别的刻板印象可能导致女性警察在虐待人民的男性警察相对于男性警察支付更高的价格（即，被视为不太合法）。 法律当局对法律态度和信仰的法律态度和信仰的效果（联合国）公平待遇的效果是稳定的。 这项研究通过评估了警察合法性的程序不断的效果来测试了不变性论文。 由两种类型的公民启动的警察遭遇组成的阶乘小插图调查被管理到基于大学的样本（n = 525）。 结果表明，程序不公正对参与者的合法性感知产生了强大而显着的影响。 无论治疗是否被男性或女性警察都被淘汰，这些效果都是一致的。 调查结果为不变性论文提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号